Boom5426/Nature-Paper-Skills.

academic-presentations

>-

academic-researcher

Use when conducting literature reviews, summarizing papers, comparing methodologies, identifying research gaps, or supporting scholarly writing across disciplines.

citation-verifier

Use when checking manuscript citations, bibliography hygiene, DOI or PMID completeness, placeholder references, or BibTeX consistency before submission or revision.

conference-paper-writing

Use when writing or revising ML or AI conference papers for venues such as NeurIPS, ICML, ICLR, ACL, AAAI, or COLM, especially when the workflow is conference-first rather than Nature-style journal-first.

data-availability

Use when drafting, auditing, or revising Data Availability statements, repository plans, accession-number placement, source-data coverage, or restricted-data wording for journal submission or resubmission.

figure-planner

Use when designing, restructuring, or auditing manuscript figures and you need to define one main claim per figure, assign panel roles, align legends with the text, or decide what belongs in main figures versus supplement.

manuscript-optimizer

Use when reviewing or revising an academic manuscript whose central claim, evidence chain, figures, terminology, and prose may have drifted out of sync before submission or resubmission.

nature-portfolio-playbook

Use when choosing among Nature, Nature Methods, or Nature Biotechnology, or when preparing a Nature Portfolio life-science manuscript for venue fit, article-type framing, and policy-aware pre-submission checks.

paper-analyzer

Use when deeply analyzing a single paper and producing structured notes on claims, methods, figures, evaluation, strengths, limitations, and related work.

paper-bootstrap

Use when starting a new manuscript project or cleaning up an existing paper directory and you need a standard structure, active source files, project memory, and venue defaults before deeper writing begins.

paper-reviewer

Use when acting as a journal or grant reviewer and writing formal reviewer-side evaluations focused on methodology, statistics, reporting standards, reproducibility, and constructive feedback.

paper-workflow

Use when deciding which paper-related skill to use or how to sequence manuscript work from project setup through submission and rebuttal.

rebuttal-response

Use when responding to journal or conference reviewer comments and you need a structured author response, aligned manuscript edits, and clear decisions about when to clarify, add evidence, concede, or respectfully disagree.

reference-audit-guide

Use when the user asks for citation-verification principles, reference-audit best practices, or guidance on preventing fake or inaccurate citations in academic writing.

results-analysis

Use when analyzing experimental results, validating comparisons, generating paper-ready results text, or turning model-evaluation outputs into figures, tables, and defensible claims.

results-section-revision

Use when revising a scientific manuscript Results section whose figures, evidence, and main claims are mostly fixed, but subsection flow, paragraph openings, reader guidance, and argumentative progression still feel abrupt, repetitive, or figure-by-figure.

submission-audit

Use when a manuscript is close to submission or resubmission and you need a preflight audit for claim support, figure-panel coverage, legend sync, methods references, terminology stability, and venue-facing risks.