dt-obs-genai

$npx mdskill add Dynatrace/dynatrace-for-ai/dt-obs-genai

Analyze AI observability signals from GenAI applications using DQL

  • Identifies and monitors key observability metrics such as latency, errors, and cost.
  • Deploys OpenTelemetry GenAI spans for detailed tracing and LLM evaluation events.
  • Uses DQL to analyze model performance, provider interactions, and token usage patterns.
  • Provides actionable insights through agent signals like tool call failures and rate limit checks.

SKILL.md

.github/skills/dt-obs-genaiView on GitHub ↗
---
name: dt-obs-genai
description: >-
  Analyzes observability signals from customer GenAI applications with DQL. Reads
  OpenTelemetry GenAI spans and LLM evaluation bizevents.

  Use for: golden signals (traffic, errors, latency, saturation); LLM signals
  (model, provider, tokens); cost/token analytics, usage attribution, and prompt
  caching; agent signals (tool calls, steps, failures, loop detection, Smartscape
  topology); conversation/session analytics; guardrails (blocked/truncated
  responses); and evaluation signals (quality, pass/fail).

  Trigger: "LLM latency", "token usage by model", "cost by model and provider",
  "cost per conversation", "who is driving token spend", "do I have prompt caching",
  "failing agent tool calls", "find runaway agents", "responses truncated or
  blocked", "failed evaluations", "am I hitting rate limits", "token throughput /
  TPM", "provider throttling or 429s".

  Do NOT use for: Davis CoPilot/MCP telemetry (dt-platform), generic service
  metrics (dt-obs-services), logs (dt-obs-logs), or non-GenAI tracing (dt-obs-tracing).
license: Apache-2.0
---

# AI Observability (GenAI) Skill

Analyze AI Observability signals from customer GenAI applications using DQL — golden
signals, LLM signals, token and cost analytics (with usage attribution and prompt-caching
economics), agent signals (including loop/runaway detection and Smartscape topology),
conversation/session-level analytics, guardrails, and evaluation quality.

---

## Core Capabilities

### Golden Signals

The four classic observability signals — traffic, errors, latency, and saturation — apply
directly to GenAI applications. Traffic is request throughput over time; errors are spans
where `span.status_code == "error"`; latency is the `duration` field (a Grail duration
value — divide by the `1ms` literal, `duration / 1ms`, for a numeric millisecond value);
saturation is proxied by total token throughput per minute (input + output tokens combined).

```dql
fetch spans, from: now()-24h
| filter isNotNull(gen_ai.request.model)
| summarize total = count(), errors = countIf(span.status_code == "error"), by: {gen_ai.request.model}
| fieldsAdd error_rate_pct = if(total > 0, errors * 100.0 / total, else: 0.0)
| sort error_rate_pct desc
```

→ **Full traffic, latency, and saturation queries:** See [references/golden-signals.md](references/golden-signals.md)

### LLM Signals

LLM signals describe which model and provider served each request, what operation type
was invoked (`chat`, `execute_tool`, `invoke_agent`, `create_agent`), and how tokens were
consumed. Use these to benchmark provider latency, compare model performance, and
understand the token distribution across model-provider combinations.

```dql
fetch spans, from: now()-24h
| filter isNotNull(gen_ai.request.model)
| summarize p95_ms = percentile(duration, 95) / 1ms, requests = count(), by: {gen_ai.provider.name}
| sort p95_ms desc
```

→ **Slowest models, token usage by model:** See [references/llm-signals.md](references/llm-signals.md)

### Cost and Tokens

Token consumption is the primary cost driver. Dynatrace stores `gen_ai.usage.input_tokens`
and `gen_ai.usage.output_tokens` on every span — there is no stored cost field; estimated
cost must be derived by multiplying token sums by the per-model price you supply. Use these
queries to identify the highest-spend model-provider combinations and detect token-burn spikes.

```dql
fetch spans, from: now()-24h
| filter isNotNull(gen_ai.usage.input_tokens) or isNotNull(gen_ai.usage.output_tokens)
| summarize input_tokens = sum(gen_ai.usage.input_tokens), output_tokens = sum(gen_ai.usage.output_tokens), total_tokens = sum(gen_ai.usage.input_tokens) + sum(gen_ai.usage.output_tokens), by: {gen_ai.provider.name, gen_ai.request.model}
| sort total_tokens desc
```

→ **Token spikes, cost estimation, most expensive prompts, usage attribution, prompt-caching economics:** See [references/cost-and-tokens.md](references/cost-and-tokens.md)

### Agent Signals

GenAI agents emit spans for each tool invocation (`execute_tool`), agent step
(`invoke_agent`), and agent creation (`create_agent`). Use agent signals to identify
which tools are called most often and which agents are failing. For *structural*
questions — which agents, models, and providers exist and how they connect — query the
GenAI Smartscape entities (`GENAI_AGENT`, `GENAI_MODEL`, `GENAI_PROVIDER`, `GENAI_SERVICE`)
instead of scanning spans; this is a feature-flag-gated preview.

```dql
fetch spans, from: now()-24h
| filter isNotNull(gen_ai.agent.name)
| summarize total = count(), errors = countIf(span.status_code == "error"), by: {gen_ai.agent.name}
| fieldsAdd error_rate_pct = if(total > 0, errors * 100.0 / total, else: 0.0)
| sort errors desc
```

→ **Tool usage, failing agents, agent step latency, loop/runaway detection, Smartscape topology:** See [references/agent-signals.md](references/agent-signals.md)

### Conversation Analytics

Per-span and per-trace signals measure one request or one turn. When the application
propagates `gen_ai.conversation.id`, you can roll spans up to the **session** level — cost
per conversation, how deep conversations run, and which sessions are runaway-expensive or
error-prone. This is the unit that matters for chargeback and user-perceived reliability.

```dql
fetch spans, from: now()-24h
| filter isNotNull(gen_ai.conversation.id)
| summarize turns = countDistinct(trace.id), total_tokens = sum(gen_ai.usage.input_tokens) + sum(gen_ai.usage.output_tokens), errors = countIf(span.status_code == "error"), by: {gen_ai.conversation.id}
| sort total_tokens desc
```

→ **Cost/depth per conversation, session error rate:** See [references/conversation-analytics.md](references/conversation-analytics.md)

### Guardrails

Guardrails surface as `gen_ai.response.finish_reasons` on the span — `content_filter` means a
safety filter blocked or redacted output, `length` means the response was truncated at the
token limit — and as the proactive safety evaluators (`prompt-injection`, `pii-leakage`,
`toxicity`, `bias`) in the evaluation bizevents. Use these to quantify blocked and truncated
responses and tie them back to the LLM-judge safety verdicts.

```dql
fetch spans, from: now()-24h
| filter isNotNull(gen_ai.response.finish_reasons)
| fieldsAdd finish_reason = gen_ai.response.finish_reasons
| expand finish_reason
| summarize calls = count(), by: {finish_reason, gen_ai.request.model}
| sort calls desc
```

→ **Blocked (content filter), truncated (length), finish-reason breakdown:** See [references/guardrails.md](references/guardrails.md)

### Evaluation Quality

Evaluation results are captured as **bizevents** (not spans) with
`event.type == "gen_ai.evaluation.result"`. Each evaluator emits one bizevent per
response, carrying the score, pass/fail label, explanation, and the exact Q&A pair.
Use evaluation queries to monitor quality dimensions and surface failed responses
with the LLM judge's reasoning. Each bizevent also carries the `trace.id` of the run that
produced the evaluated response, so you can pivot from a quality failure to the spans that
caused it.

```dql
fetch bizevents, from: now()-24h
| filter event.type == "gen_ai.evaluation.result"
| filter gen_ai.evaluation.score.label == "fail"
| fields timestamp, gen_ai.evaluation.name, gen_ai.evaluation.score.value, gen_ai.evaluation.explanation, gen_ai.evaluation.input.question, gen_ai.evaluation.input.answer
| sort timestamp desc
```

→ **Quality scores, failed evaluations, fail rates:** See [references/evaluations.md](references/evaluations.md)

### Empty-State Check

When any signal query returns no rows, do not report "no data found" — first confirm
whether the application sends GenAI telemetry at all. These two presence checks show
which signal families are present:

```dql
fetch spans, from: now()-24h
| summarize 
    has_genai = countIf(isNotNull(gen_ai.request.model)), 
    has_tokens = countIf(isNotNull(gen_ai.usage.input_tokens) or isNotNull(gen_ai.usage.output_tokens)), 
    has_agents = countIf(isNotNull(gen_ai.agent.name)), 
    has_tools = countIf(gen_ai.operation.name == "execute_tool"), 
    has_conversation = countIf(isNotNull(gen_ai.conversation.id)), 
    has_finish_reason = countIf(isNotNull(gen_ai.response.finish_reasons)), 
    has_cached_tokens = countIf(isNotNull(gen_ai.usage.cache_read.input_tokens) or isNotNull(gen_ai.usage.cache_creation.input_tokens)),
    total = count()
    
```

```dql
fetch bizevents, from: now()-24h
| filter event.type == "gen_ai.evaluation.result"
| summarize evals = count()
```

If `has_genai` is zero, report that the application appears not to be instrumented for AI
Observability yet — not "no data found". If `has_genai` is non-zero but a specific family
(`has_tokens`, `has_agents`, `has_tools`, `has_conversation`, `has_finish_reason`,
`has_cached_tokens`, `evals`) is zero, only that signal type is missing — for example
`has_conversation == 0` means session-level analytics are unavailable because the app does
not propagate a conversation id, and `has_cached_tokens == 0` means prompt-caching telemetry
is not being reported. These optional families may use different attribute names depending on
the provider/SDK; verify before reporting them absent.

---

## Agent Instructions

### Act First, Refine Later

When a user asks for analysis, proceed immediately with sensible defaults. Do not ask
for parameter values you can reasonably assume.

**Default values when not specified:**

| Parameter | Default | Rationale |
|-----------|---------|-----------|
| Timeframe | Last 24 h (`from: now()-24h`) | Covers a full operational day without being too narrow |
| Model scope | All models (no model filter) | Shows the full picture; user can narrow after seeing results |
| Provider scope | All providers | Same rationale as model scope |
| Token threshold | None | Show all — let the data reveal the outliers |

**Exception — cost prices.** Per-model prices are the one input you cannot
default (there is no cost field in the data). Ask the user for them before
estimating USD; never use prices from memory. See [cost-and-tokens.md](references/cost-and-tokens.md).

### Empty-State Rule

When any signal query returns no rows, run the two presence checks in the
**Empty-State Check** capability above before responding — never reply "no data found".
If `has_genai` is zero, report that the application appears not to be instrumented for AI
Observability yet; if only a specific family is zero, say which signal type is missing.

### Scope Boundary

This skill covers AI Observability signals for **customer GenAI applications** only.
Product documentation and configuration how-to questions (e.g., "How do I configure
the Dynatrace OTLP endpoint?") go to `ask-dynatrace-docs` — this skill does not
contain product configuration how-tos.

### Understanding User Intent

**Map user requests and prompt-starter phrasings to capabilities:**

| User Request / Prompt Starter | Capability | Reference File |
|-------------------------------|------------|----------------|
| "Understand AI Observability signals" | All signal categories overview | This SKILL.md |
| "Analyze LLM latency and errors", "LLM errors", "error rate by model" | Golden Signals | [golden-signals.md](references/golden-signals.md) |
| "Which models are slowest right now?", "compare latency across providers" | LLM Signals | [llm-signals.md](references/llm-signals.md) |
| "Show token usage by model", "token usage spikes" | Cost and Tokens | [cost-and-tokens.md](references/cost-and-tokens.md) |
| "Break down cost by model and provider", "which prompts are most expensive?" | Cost and Tokens | [cost-and-tokens.md](references/cost-and-tokens.md) |
| "Trace a failing agent run", "show failed tool calls" | Agent Signals | [agent-signals.md](references/agent-signals.md) |
| "Break down agent steps by latency" | Agent Signals | [agent-signals.md](references/agent-signals.md) |
| "Map agent topology", "which models does this agent use?", "list GenAI agents/models/providers" | Agent Signals (Smartscape) | [agent-signals.md](references/agent-signals.md) |
| "Is an agent stuck in a loop?", "find runaway agents", "what caused the token spike?" | Agent Signals (loops) | [agent-signals.md](references/agent-signals.md) |
| "Cost per conversation", "most expensive sessions", "how deep do conversations run?" | Conversation Analytics | [conversation-analytics.md](references/conversation-analytics.md) |
| "Stitch together an agent trajectory", "filter by session id", "connect traces across a session" | Conversation Analytics | [conversation-analytics.md](references/conversation-analytics.md) |
| "How often are responses blocked/filtered?", "are responses being truncated?", "finish reasons" | Guardrails | [guardrails.md](references/guardrails.md) |
| "Cost by application/user/tenant", "who is driving token spend?" | Cost and Tokens (attribution) | [cost-and-tokens.md](references/cost-and-tokens.md) |
| "Do I have prompt caching?", "cache hit rate", "caching savings" | Cost and Tokens (caching) | [cost-and-tokens.md](references/cost-and-tokens.md) |
| "Summarize evaluation quality scores", "show low-scoring responses", "show failed evaluations" | Evaluation Quality | [evaluations.md](references/evaluations.md) |
| "What signals am I missing?", "why is there no data?" | Empty-State Check | This SKILL.md |

---

## Common Workflows

### Workflow: Cost Investigation

```
1. Run token usage by model and provider (cost-and-tokens.md → "Token usage by model and provider")
2. Identify the top model-provider combinations by total_tokens
3. For the top offenders, run token usage spikes to check for abnormal time windows
4. Use the cost-estimation template in "Most expensive prompts and models" to estimate USD spend — ask the user for per-model prices first (see "Exception — cost prices" under Agent Instructions)
5. Check for prompt-size outliers: high input_tokens / output_tokens ratio indicates large context windows
6. Attribute spend to a consumer (cost-and-tokens.md → "Usage attribution") and check whether prompt caching is enabled and effective (cost-and-tokens.md → "Prompt caching economics")
```

### Workflow: Token-Spike / Runaway Investigation

```
1. Run token usage spikes (cost-and-tokens.md → "Token usage spikes") to find the abnormal time window
2. Within that window, run repeated-tool-calls and runaway-turn queries (agent-signals.md → "Agent loops and runaway detection")
3. For a flagged trace.id, open the trace to see what the agent looped on
4. If conversation ids are present, re-run the loop query grouped by gen_ai.conversation.id to catch cross-turn loops (conversation-analytics.md)
```

### Workflow: Failing Agent Run

```
1. Run failing agent activity query (agent-signals.md → "Failing agent activity")
2. Sort by errors desc to find the most error-prone agent
3. Take the trace.id from a failing span and open in Dynatrace distributed-tracing view
4. Check agent steps by latency (agent-signals.md) to see which operation type is slowest
```

### Workflow: Guardrail & Safety Review

```
1. Run the guardrails presence check (guardrails.md) to confirm finish reasons are recorded
2. Run the finish-reason breakdown, then the blocked (content_filter) and truncated (length) queries
3. Correlate content-filter spikes with the prompt-injection evaluator and truncation with answer-completeness failures (evaluations.md)
4. For a specific block or failure, take the trace.id and pivot to the originating spans (evaluations.md → "Correlating evaluations to traces")
```

### Workflow: Evaluation Review

```
1. Run evaluation quality scores (evaluations.md → "Evaluation quality scores") to rank evaluators by avg_score asc
2. Focus on the lowest-scoring evaluator
3. Run failed evaluations (evaluations.md → "Failed evaluations") to surface the exact Q&A pairs and LLM judge explanations
4. Use the "Fail rate by evaluator" query to see how many responses fail each evaluator and the share of total evaluations
5. To root-cause a specific failure, take its trace.id and pivot to the originating spans (evaluations.md → "Correlating evaluations to traces")
```

---

## References

- [references/golden-signals.md](references/golden-signals.md) — traffic, errors, latency, saturation
- [references/llm-signals.md](references/llm-signals.md) — slowest models, provider latency, token usage by model
- [references/cost-and-tokens.md](references/cost-and-tokens.md) — token usage, spikes, cost-estimation template, usage attribution, prompt-caching economics
- [references/agent-signals.md](references/agent-signals.md) — tool usage, failing agents, step latency, loop/runaway detection, Smartscape agent topology (preview)
- [references/conversation-analytics.md](references/conversation-analytics.md) — session-level cost, depth, and error rate (`gen_ai.conversation.id`)
- [references/guardrails.md](references/guardrails.md) — blocked (content filter) and truncated (length) responses via finish reasons
- [references/evaluations.md](references/evaluations.md) — quality scores, failed evals, fail-rate, trace correlation (bizevents)

More from Dynatrace/dynatrace-for-ai

SkillDescription
dt-alertingEnd-to-end Dynatrace alerting lifecycle — anomaly detector setup and model selection (static threshold, adaptive baseline, seasonal baseline), alert event storage in Grail, problem grouping and denoising by root cause analysis, and workflow-based notification routing (email, Slack, ServiceNow, webhook). Use when configuring alerting, choosing between detector types, querying alert event history, understanding why alerts merged into a problem, or setting up problem-triggered notifications.
dt-app-dashboardsWork with Dynatrace dashboards - create, modify, query, and analyze dashboard JSON including tiles, layouts, DQL queries, variables, and visualizations.
dt-app-notebooksWork with Dynatrace notebooks - create, modify, query, and analyze notebook JSON including sections, DQL queries, and visualizations.
dt-dql-essentialsCore DQL syntax, pitfalls, query patterns, and query optimization. Load to write, build, fix, or OPTIMIZE a DQL query — prevents syntax errors and makes queries faster, more efficient, and cheaper (less data scanned = lower query consumption/cost per run). Covers fetch commands, data models, field namespaces, time alignment, entity/smartscape patterns, metric discovery, and performance/cost optimization (filter early, bucket filters, short time ranges, field selection, sampling, cardinality). Trigger: \"write/build/fix a DQL query\", \"DQL syntax\", \"query logs/spans/metrics\", \"create a timeseries\", \"optimize my DQL\", \"make my query faster/cheaper\", \"reduce DQL cost/consumption/scanned data\", \"keep DQL cost under control\". Do NOT use to explain an existing query or answer product questions. For MONITORING a tenant's ACTUAL query consumption/billing (how much queries cost, who scanned most, cost trends) use dt-platform-costs — this tunes the query text, not billing data.
dt-js-runtimeDynatrace server-side JS runtime — function contract, runtime limits, Web APIs, Node.js modules, fetch with credential vault, and the @dynatrace-sdk/* catalog.
dt-migrationMigrate Dynatrace classic and Gen2 entity-based DQL to Smartscape equivalents. Covers three scenarios. (1) mass data queries filtered by classic entity conditions — migrate to direct dimension filters first, Smartscape only as fallback; (2) mass data queries using entity subqueries for filtering — same dimension-first strategy; (3) pure entity list queries — migrate fetch dt.entity.* to smartscapeNodes. Also handles entityName, entityAttr, classicEntitySelector, and classic relationship patterns.
dt-obs-androidInstruments an existing Android project (Kotlin or Java) with the Dynatrace Mobile Agent for basic monitoring. Covers zero-to-first-event setup only: Gradle plugin, agent config, and user privacy opt-in. Do not use for advanced Dynatrace configuration beyond initial instrumentation.
dt-obs-aws>-
dt-obs-azureAzure cloud resources including VMs, VMSS, SQL Database, Storage, AKS, App Service, Functions, VNet networking, load balancers, Event Hubs, Container Apps, and Key Vault. Monitor Azure infrastructure, analyze resource usage, audit security posture, and manage organizational hierarchy across subscriptions and resource groups.
dt-obs-flutter>-