documentation
$
npx mdskill add EpicenterHQ/epicenter/documentationWrites clear in-code documentation and READMEs explaining the why, not the what
- Solves the problem of unclear code intent and missing rationale in documentation
- Uses JSDoc, code comments, and folder READMEs to explain decisions and architecture
- Focuses on non-obvious context, boundaries, and relationships in the codebase
- Delivers structured explanations that help developers understand and maintain the code
SKILL.md
.github/skills/documentationView on GitHub ↗
---
name: documentation
description: 'In-code documentation, folder READMEs, code comments. Use when: "document this", "add JSDoc", "write a README", "explain this code", or writing README.md/JSDoc.'
metadata:
author: epicenter
version: '1.0'
---
# Documentation
Follow [writing-voice](../writing-voice/SKILL.md) for tone.
For architecture walkthroughs, folder mental models, or newcomer explanations, use [notebook-explanation](../notebook-explanation/SKILL.md) for the shape.
Documentation explains **why**, not **what**. Users can read code to see what it does. They need you to explain the reasoning.
## When to Apply This Skill
Use this pattern when you need to:
- Write or update folder `README.md` files with architecture intent.
- Add JSDoc to public APIs with usage context and examples.
- Review docs/comments that currently restate code without rationale.
- Add code comments for non-obvious decisions, constraints, or workarounds.
## Folder READMEs
Primary job: explain **why** this folder exists and the mental model.
Notebook style is often the clearest README opening:
```txt
Question:
Why does this folder exist?
Model:
file group = responsibility
boundary = owner
Flow:
input
-> module
-> output
Rule:
when adding code here, preserve this boundary
```
### Can Include
- ASCII art diagrams for complex relationships
- Overview of key exports or entry points
- Brief file descriptions IF they add context beyond the filename
- Relationships to other folders
### Avoid
- Exhaustive file listings that just duplicate `ls`
- Descriptions that repeat the filename ("auth.ts - authentication")
- Implementation details better expressed in code
### Good
````markdown
# Converters
Transform field schemas into format-specific representations.
```
┌─────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐
│ Field Schema│────▶│ to-arktype │────▶ Runtime validation
└─────────────┘ ├──────────────┤
│ to-drizzle │────▶ SQLite columns
└──────────────┘
```
Field schemas are pure JSON Schema objects with `x-component` hints. Each converter takes the same input and produces output for a specific consumer.
````
### Bad
```markdown
# Converters
- `to-arktype.ts` - Converts to ArkType
- `to-drizzle.ts` - Converts to Drizzle
- `index.ts` - Exports
```
The bad example just lists files without explaining the pattern or when to add new converters.
## JSDoc Comments
JSDoc explains **when and why** to use something, not just what it does.
### Good
````typescript
/**
* Get all table helpers as an array.
*
* Useful for providers and indexes that need to iterate over all tables.
* Returns only the table helpers, excluding utility methods like `clearAll`.
*
* @example
* ```typescript
* for (const table of tables.defined()) {
* console.log(table.name, table.count());
* }
* ```
*/
defined() { ... }
````
### Bad
```typescript
/** Returns all table helpers as an array. */
defined() { ... }
```
### Rules
- Include `@example` blocks with realistic usage
- Explain WHEN to use it, not just WHAT it does
- Document non-obvious behavior or edge cases
- Public APIs get detailed docs; internal helpers can be minimal
## Code Comments
Comments explain **why**, not **what**.
### Good
```typescript
// Y.Doc clientIDs are random 32-bit integers, so we can't rely on ordering.
// Use timestamps from the entries themselves for deterministic sorting.
const sorted = entries.sort((a, b) => a.timestamp - b.timestamp);
```
### Bad
```typescript
// Sort the entries
const sorted = entries.sort((a, b) => a.timestamp - b.timestamp);
```
### Rules
- If the code is clear, don't comment it
- Comment the "why" when it's not obvious
- Comment workarounds with links to issues/docs
- Delete commented-out code; that's what git is for