review-ticket
$
npx mdskill add HoangNguyen0403/agent-skills-standard/review-ticket> [!IMPORTANT] > Review a ticket or PR through focused specialist lenses: scope, architecture, security, tests, AC coverage, and PR metadata.
SKILL.md
.github/skills/review-ticketView on GitHub ↗
---
name: review-ticket
description: "Review a ticket or PR through focused specialist lenses: scope, architecture, security, tests, AC coverage, and PR metadata."
metadata:
triggers:
keywords:
- review ticket
- workflow
---
# Review Ticket Skill
> [!IMPORTANT]
> Review a ticket or PR through focused specialist lenses: scope, architecture, security, tests, AC coverage, and PR metadata.
## Instructions
When the user asks to perform this workflow, execute the following steps:
# Review Ticket Workflow
Goal: Produce a PR-ready review verdict using compact specialist fanout and evidence-linked findings.
## Steps
1. Load scope:
- Ticket/story, PR URL/diff, changed files, ACs, test evidence, and loaded framework skills.
- Jira/GitHub/GitLab/ADO/Zephyr/code-review-graph MCPs when configured; otherwise use exported ticket, diff, and local files.
2. Run specialist lenses:
- `specialist-codebase-scout`: affected files, patterns, blast radius, tests.
- `specialist-pr-reviewer`: PR/MR metadata, active threads, template gaps.
- `specialist-ac-verifier`: AC coverage and scope creep.
- `specialist-architecture-guard`: architecture and design risks.
- `specialist-security-reviewer`: OWASP, Vibe Security, data provenance.
- `specialist-test-gap-finder`: missing tests and weak assertions.
3. Merge findings:
- Deduplicate by root cause.
- Keep only actionable findings with evidence.
- Calibrate severity: Blocker, Major, Minor, Suggestion.
- Mark unverified items as assumptions or requests for evidence.
4. Decide verdict:
- APPROVE: no Blocker/Major, required evidence present.
- CHANGES REQUESTED: fixable Blocker/Major.
- BLOCKED: missing diff, ticket, environment, or required tool/export.
5. Optional publish:
- Use `specialist-pr-commenter-batch` only after user approves posting comments.
- Otherwise produce local review report.
## Output Template
```md
# Review Ticket Report
## Verdict
## Findings
| Severity | Lens | Evidence | Fix |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| [severity] | [lens] | [file/AC/tool] | [fix] |
## Evidence Gaps
## Next Workflow
## Cost Report
```