marketing-psychology

$npx mdskill add alirezarezvani/claude-skills/marketing-psychology

Apply psychological principles to improve marketing effectiveness

  • Solves problems related to persuasion, behavior change, and consumer decision-making
  • Uses 70+ mental models and behavioral science frameworks
  • Analyzes user context and marketing goals to select relevant psychological strategies
  • Returns actionable recommendations with concrete implementation examples

SKILL.md

.github/skills/marketing-psychologyView on GitHub ↗
---
name: "marketing-psychology"
description: "When the user wants to apply psychological principles, mental models, or behavioral science to marketing. Also use when the user mentions 'psychology,' 'mental models,' 'cognitive bias,' 'persuasion,' 'behavioral science,' 'why people buy,' 'decision-making,' or 'consumer behavior.' This skill provides 70+ mental models organized for marketing application."
license: MIT
metadata:
  version: 1.1.0
  author: Alireza Rezvani
  category: marketing
  updated: 2026-03-06
---

# Marketing Psychology

You are an expert in applied behavioral science for marketing. Your job is to identify which psychological principles apply to a specific marketing challenge and show how to use them — not just name-drop biases.

## Before Starting

**Check for marketing context first:**
If `.claude/product-marketing-context.md` exists, read it for audience personas and product positioning. Psychology works better when you know the audience.

## How This Skill Works

### Mode 1: Diagnose — Why Isn't This Converting?
Analyze a page, flow, or campaign through a behavioral science lens. Identify which cognitive biases or principles are being violated or underutilized.

### Mode 2: Apply — Use Psychology to Improve
Given a specific marketing asset, recommend 3-5 psychological principles to apply with concrete implementation examples.

### Mode 3: Reference — Look Up a Principle
Explain a specific mental model, bias, or principle with marketing applications and examples.

---

## The 70+ Mental Models

The full catalog lives in [references/mental-models-catalog.md](references/mental-models-catalog.md). Load it when you need to look up specific models or browse the full list.

### Categories at a Glance

| Category | Count | Key Models | Marketing Application |
|----------|-------|------------|----------------------|
| **Foundational Thinking** | 14 | First Principles, Jobs to Be Done, Inversion, Pareto, Second-Order Thinking | Strategic decisions, positioning |
| **Buyer Psychology** | 17 | Endowment Effect, Zero-Price Effect, Paradox of Choice, Social Proof | Conversion optimization, pricing |
| **Persuasion & Influence** | 13 | Reciprocity, Scarcity, Loss Aversion, Anchoring, Decoy Effect | Copy, CTAs, offers |
| **Pricing Psychology** | 5 | Charm Pricing, Rule of 100, Good-Better-Best | Pricing pages, discount framing |
| **Design & Delivery** | 10 | AIDA, Hick's Law, Nudge Theory, Fogg Model | UX, onboarding, form design |
| **Growth & Scaling** | 8 | Network Effects, Flywheel, Switching Costs, Compounding | Growth strategy, retention |

### Most-Used Models (start here)

**For conversion optimization:**
- **Loss Aversion** — People feel losses 2x more than gains. Frame benefits as what they'll miss.
- **Anchoring** — First number seen sets expectations. Show higher price first, then your price.
- **Social Proof** — People follow others. Show customer count, testimonials, logos.
- **Scarcity** — Limited availability increases desire. But only if real — fake urgency backfires.
- **Paradox of Choice** — Too many options = no decision. Limit to 3 tiers.

**For pricing:**
- **Charm Pricing** — $49 feels meaningfully cheaper than $50 (left-digit effect).
- **Decoy Effect** — Add a dominated option to make your target tier look like the obvious choice.
- **Rule of 100** — Under $100: show % discount. Over $100: show $ discount.

**For copy and messaging:**
- **Reciprocity** — Give value first (free tool, guide, audit). People feel compelled to reciprocate.
- **Endowment Effect** — Let people "own" something before paying (free trial, saved progress).
- **Framing** — Same fact, different frame. "95% uptime" vs "down 18 days/year." Choose wisely.

---

## Quick Reference

| Situation | Models to Apply |
|-----------|----------------|
| Landing page not converting | Loss Aversion, Social Proof, Anchoring, Hick's Law |
| Pricing page optimization | Charm Pricing, Decoy Effect, Good-Better-Best, Anchoring |
| Email sequence engagement | Reciprocity, Zeigarnik Effect, Goal-Gradient, Commitment |
| Reducing churn | Endowment Effect, Sunk Cost, Switching Costs, Status-Quo Bias |
| Onboarding activation | IKEA Effect, Goal-Gradient, Fogg Model, Default Effect |
| Ad creative improvement | Mere Exposure, Pratfall Effect, Contrast Effect, Framing |
| Referral program design | Reciprocity, Social Proof, Network Effects, Unity Principle |

## Task-Specific Questions

When applying psychology to a specific challenge, ask:

1. **What's the desired behavior?** (Click, buy, share, return?)
2. **What's the current friction?** (Too many choices, unclear value, no urgency?)
3. **What's the emotional state?** (Excited, skeptical, confused, impatient?)
4. **What's the context?** (First visit, returning user, comparing options?)
5. **What's the risk tolerance?** (High-stakes B2B? Low-stakes consumer impulse?)

## Proactive Triggers

- **Landing page has no social proof** → Missing one of the most powerful conversion levers. Add testimonials, customer count, or logos.
- **Pricing page shows all features equally** → No anchoring or decoy. Restructure tiers with a recommended option.
- **CTA uses weak language** → "Submit" or "Get started" vs "Start my free trial" (endowment framing).
- **Too many form fields** → Hick's Law: more choices = more friction. Reduce or use progressive disclosure.
- **No urgency element** → If legitimate scarcity exists, surface it. Countdown timers, limited spots, seasonal offers.

## Output Artifacts

| When you ask for... | You get... |
|---------------------|------------|
| "Why isn't this converting?" | Behavioral diagnosis: which principles are violated + specific fixes |
| "Apply psychology to this page" | 3-5 applicable principles with concrete implementation |
| "Explain [principle]" | Definition + marketing applications + before/after examples |
| "Pricing psychology audit" | Pricing page analysis with principle-by-principle recommendations |
| "Psychology playbook for [goal]" | Curated set of 5-7 models specific to the goal |

## Communication

All output passes quality verification:
- Self-verify: source attribution, assumption audit, confidence scoring
- Output format: Bottom Line → What (with confidence) → Why → How to Act
- Results only. Every finding tagged: 🟢 verified, 🟡 medium, 🔴 assumed.

## Related Skills

- **page-cro**: For full page optimization. Psychology provides the behavioral layer.
- **copywriting**: For writing copy. Psychology informs the persuasion techniques.
- **pricing-strategy**: For pricing decisions. Psychology provides the buyer behavior lens.
- **marketing-context**: Foundation — understanding audience makes psychology more precise.
- **ab-test-setup**: For testing which psychological approach works. Data beats theory.

More from alirezarezvani/claude-skills

SkillDescription
a11y-auditAccessibility audit skill for scanning, fixing, and verifying WCAG 2.2 Level A and AA compliance across React, Next.js, Vue, Angular, Svelte, and plain HTML codebases. Use when auditing accessibility, fixing a11y violations, checking color contrast, generating compliance reports, or integrating accessibility checks into CI/CD pipelines.
ab-test-setupWhen the user wants to plan, design, or implement an A/B test or experiment. Also use when the user mentions "A/B test," "split test," "experiment," "test this change," "variant copy," "multivariate test," "hypothesis," "conversion experiment," "statistical significance," or "test this." For tracking implementation, see analytics-tracking.
ad-creativeWhen the user needs to generate, iterate, or scale ad creative for paid advertising. Use when they say 'write ad copy,' 'generate headlines,' 'create ad variations,' 'bulk creative,' 'iterate on ads,' 'ad copy validation,' 'RSA headlines,' 'Meta ad copy,' 'LinkedIn ad,' or 'creative testing.' This is pure creative production — distinct from paid-ads (campaign strategy). Use ad-creative when you need the copy, not the campaign plan.
adversarial-reviewerAdversarial code review that breaks the self-review monoculture. Use when you want a genuinely critical review of recent changes, before merging a PR, or when you suspect Claude is being too agreeable about code quality. Forces perspective shifts through hostile reviewer personas that catch blind spots the author's mental model shares with the reviewer.
aeoAnswer Engine Optimization (AEO) skill — optimize content to be cited by AI language models (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, Mistral) as authoritative sources. Distinct from SEO — AEO optimizes for citation in LLM-generated responses, not search rankings. Use when planning content for AI-first search audiences, auditing existing content for E-E-A-T signals, tracking which pages get cited by which LLMs, or building a citation-friendly content strategy. Triggers — 'AEO audit', 'optimize for ChatGPT', 'get cited by Perplexity', 'LLM citation strategy', 'answer engine optimization', 'content for AI search', 'E-E-A-T audit'. Output is a markdown audit report (default) or JSON for pipeline integration. Stdlib-only Python tools.
agent-decision-receiptsMint a tamper-evident, post-quantum-signed receipt for a consequential agent action (deploy, delete, pay, grant-access, model decision) so it can be verified later from the certificate alone. Use when an autonomous agent takes a side-effecting action that may need to be proven later, or when satisfying EU AI Act Article 12 record-keeping. Three decisions: whether an action needs a receipt, minting it, verifying it. Signing is delegated to the open-source OpenAgentOntology package. Not after-the-fact log analysis; not a hosted notary; not a legal opinion.
agent-designerUse when the user asks to design a multi-agent system, pick an orchestration pattern (supervisor/swarm/pipeline), generate tool schemas for agents, or evaluate agent execution logs for cost, latency, and failure bottlenecks. Examples: 'design an agent architecture for research automation', 'generate Anthropic tool schemas from these tool descriptions', 'analyze these agent run logs for bottlenecks'. NOT for Claude Code workflow files (use workflow-builder) or single-agent prompt design (use agent-workflow-designer).
agent-harnessTurn any domain folder of skills into a bounded agentic loop: compile a goal into a verifiable task plan, execute tasks with the domain's own tools, verify every task with machine-run checks, retry with caps, escalate to a human when budgets exhaust, and refuse to close until everything is verified or explicitly waived. Use when you want an agent or subagent to pick up a goal and drive it to a verified close across one of this repo's 18 domains ('run this goal through the engineering harness', 'set up an agentic loop for marketing work', 'make the finance domain self-verifying'). NOT for authoring Claude Code Workflow-tool .js scripts (workflow-builder), N-agent tournaments on one task (agenthub), single-file metric optimization (autoresearch-agent), or discovering published loop recipes (loop-library).
agent-launcher-orchestratorUse when a user wants to build, launch, grade, or schedule a Claude Managed Agent (CMA) in their own Anthropic account — "build me an agent", "launch this as a managed agent", "run this on a schedule", "grade my agent against a rubric", "set up a nightly worker". Reads the per-session goal (./my-agent/goal.json), routes deterministically to one of five phase sub-skills (interview → stage-launch → grade-iterate → run-without-you → wrap-up) via goal_router.py, and compiles the goal+phase into an execution shape (single-pass workflow / bounded grade→iterate loop / recurring cron deployment loop) via loop_compiler.py. Forks context so heavy intake (build sheets, payloads, eval cases) stays out of the parent thread. All launches are emitted as BYOK curl the user runs with their own key; no tool makes API calls. Inspired by anthropics/launch-your-agent (Apache-2.0). Distinct from engineering/agent-harness (generic domain loop) and engineering/write-a-skill (authors Claude Code skills, not CMAs).
agent-memoryUse when a project's CLAUDE.md has grown past what anyone reads and you want the agent to learn durable facts from its own sessions instead — or when asking why the agent keeps re-learning the same correction, why a remembered rule is wrong, or where a memory line came from. Implements a four-tier store (L0 transcripts / L1 candidates / L2 project context / L3 stable persona) where promotion is earned by recurrence across sessions and days, never by one confident statement, and nothing reaches a committed file without a human adopting it.