senior-ml-engineer

$npx mdskill add alirezarezvani/claude-skills/senior-ml-engineer

Deploy production ML models with MLOps pipelines and LLM integration.

  • Handles model deployment, feature stores, drift monitoring, and RAG systems.
  • Integrates MLflow, Kubeflow, Kubernetes, Docker, and LLM APIs.
  • Executes retry logic and cost controls for API integrations.
  • Delivers operational guidance focused on production concerns.

SKILL.md

.github/skills/senior-ml-engineerView on GitHub ↗
---
name: "senior-ml-engineer"
description: ML engineering skill for productionizing models, building MLOps pipelines, and integrating LLMs. Covers model deployment, feature stores, drift monitoring, RAG systems, and cost optimization. Use when the user asks about deploying ML models to production, setting up MLOps infrastructure (MLflow, Kubeflow, Kubernetes, Docker), monitoring model performance or drift, building RAG pipelines, or integrating LLM APIs with retry logic and cost controls. Focused on production and operational concerns rather than model research or initial training.
triggers:
  - MLOps pipeline
  - model deployment
  - feature store
  - model monitoring
  - drift detection
  - RAG system
  - LLM integration
  - model serving
  - A/B testing ML
  - automated retraining
---

# Senior ML Engineer

Production ML engineering patterns for model deployment, MLOps infrastructure, and LLM integration.

---

## Table of Contents

- [Model Deployment Workflow](#model-deployment-workflow)
- [MLOps Pipeline Setup](#mlops-pipeline-setup)
- [LLM Integration Workflow](#llm-integration-workflow)
- [RAG System Implementation](#rag-system-implementation)
- [Model Monitoring](#model-monitoring)
- [Reference Documentation](#reference-documentation)
- [Tools](#tools)

---

## Model Deployment Workflow

Deploy a trained model to production with monitoring:

1. Export model to standardized format (ONNX, TorchScript, SavedModel)
2. Package model with dependencies in Docker container
3. Deploy to staging environment
4. Run integration tests against staging
5. Deploy canary (5% traffic) to production
6. Monitor latency and error rates for 1 hour
7. Promote to full production if metrics pass
8. **Validation:** p95 latency < 100ms, error rate < 0.1%

### Container Template

```dockerfile
FROM python:3.11-slim

COPY requirements.txt .
RUN pip install --no-cache-dir -r requirements.txt

COPY model/ /app/model/
COPY src/ /app/src/

HEALTHCHECK CMD curl -f http://localhost:8080/health || exit 1

EXPOSE 8080
CMD ["uvicorn", "src.server:app", "--host", "0.0.0.0", "--port", "8080"]
```

### Serving Options

| Option | Latency | Throughput | Use Case |
|--------|---------|------------|----------|
| FastAPI + Uvicorn | Low | Medium | REST APIs, small models |
| Triton Inference Server | Very Low | Very High | GPU inference, batching |
| TensorFlow Serving | Low | High | TensorFlow models |
| TorchServe | Low | High | PyTorch models |
| Ray Serve | Medium | High | Complex pipelines, multi-model |

---

## MLOps Pipeline Setup

Establish automated training and deployment:

1. Configure feature store (Feast, Tecton) for training data
2. Set up experiment tracking (MLflow, Weights & Biases)
3. Create training pipeline with hyperparameter logging
4. Register model in model registry with version metadata
5. Configure staging deployment triggered by registry events
6. Set up A/B testing infrastructure for model comparison
7. Enable drift monitoring with alerting
8. **Validation:** New models automatically evaluated against baseline

### Feature Store Pattern

```python
from feast import Entity, Feature, FeatureView, FileSource

user = Entity(name="user_id", value_type=ValueType.INT64)

user_features = FeatureView(
    name="user_features",
    entities=["user_id"],
    ttl=timedelta(days=1),
    features=[
        Feature(name="purchase_count_30d", dtype=ValueType.INT64),
        Feature(name="avg_order_value", dtype=ValueType.FLOAT),
    ],
    online=True,
    source=FileSource(path="data/user_features.parquet"),
)
```

### Retraining Triggers

| Trigger | Detection | Action |
|---------|-----------|--------|
| Scheduled | Cron (weekly/monthly) | Full retrain |
| Performance drop | Accuracy < threshold | Immediate retrain |
| Data drift | PSI > 0.2 | Evaluate, then retrain |
| New data volume | X new samples | Incremental update |

---

## LLM Integration Workflow

Integrate LLM APIs into production applications:

1. Create provider abstraction layer for vendor flexibility
2. Implement retry logic with exponential backoff
3. Configure fallback to secondary provider
4. Set up token counting and context truncation
5. Add response caching for repeated queries
6. Implement cost tracking per request
7. Add structured output validation with Pydantic
8. **Validation:** Response parses correctly, cost within budget

### Provider Abstraction

```python
from abc import ABC, abstractmethod
from tenacity import retry, stop_after_attempt, wait_exponential

class LLMProvider(ABC):
    @abstractmethod
    def complete(self, prompt: str, **kwargs) -> str:
        pass

@retry(stop=stop_after_attempt(3), wait=wait_exponential(min=1, max=10))
def call_llm_with_retry(provider: LLMProvider, prompt: str) -> str:
    return provider.complete(prompt)
```

### Cost Management

| Provider | Input Cost | Output Cost |
|----------|------------|-------------|
| GPT-4 | $0.03/1K | $0.06/1K |
| GPT-3.5 | $0.0005/1K | $0.0015/1K |
| Claude 3 Opus | $0.015/1K | $0.075/1K |
| Claude 3 Haiku | $0.00025/1K | $0.00125/1K |

---

## RAG System Implementation

Build retrieval-augmented generation pipeline:

1. Choose vector database (Pinecone, Qdrant, Weaviate)
2. Select embedding model based on quality/cost tradeoff
3. Implement document chunking strategy
4. Create ingestion pipeline with metadata extraction
5. Build retrieval with query embedding
6. Add reranking for relevance improvement
7. Format context and send to LLM
8. **Validation:** Response references retrieved context, no hallucinations

### Vector Database Selection

| Database | Hosting | Scale | Latency | Best For |
|----------|---------|-------|---------|----------|
| Pinecone | Managed | High | Low | Production, managed |
| Qdrant | Both | High | Very Low | Performance-critical |
| Weaviate | Both | High | Low | Hybrid search |
| Chroma | Self-hosted | Medium | Low | Prototyping |
| pgvector | Self-hosted | Medium | Medium | Existing Postgres |

### Chunking Strategies

| Strategy | Chunk Size | Overlap | Best For |
|----------|------------|---------|----------|
| Fixed | 500-1000 tokens | 50-100 | General text |
| Sentence | 3-5 sentences | 1 sentence | Structured text |
| Semantic | Variable | Based on meaning | Research papers |
| Recursive | Hierarchical | Parent-child | Long documents |

---

## Model Monitoring

Monitor production models for drift and degradation:

1. Set up latency tracking (p50, p95, p99)
2. Configure error rate alerting
3. Implement input data drift detection
4. Track prediction distribution shifts
5. Log ground truth when available
6. Compare model versions with A/B metrics
7. Set up automated retraining triggers
8. **Validation:** Alerts fire before user-visible degradation

### Drift Detection

```python
from scipy.stats import ks_2samp

def detect_drift(reference, current, threshold=0.05):
    statistic, p_value = ks_2samp(reference, current)
    return {
        "drift_detected": p_value < threshold,
        "ks_statistic": statistic,
        "p_value": p_value
    }
```

### Alert Thresholds

| Metric | Warning | Critical |
|--------|---------|----------|
| p95 latency | > 100ms | > 200ms |
| Error rate | > 0.1% | > 1% |
| PSI (drift) | > 0.1 | > 0.2 |
| Accuracy drop | > 2% | > 5% |

---

## Reference Documentation

### MLOps Production Patterns

`references/mlops_production_patterns.md` contains:

- Model deployment pipeline with Kubernetes manifests
- Feature store architecture with Feast examples
- Model monitoring with drift detection code
- A/B testing infrastructure with traffic splitting
- Automated retraining pipeline with MLflow

### LLM Integration Guide

`references/llm_integration_guide.md` contains:

- Provider abstraction layer pattern
- Retry and fallback strategies with tenacity
- Prompt engineering templates (few-shot, CoT)
- Token optimization with tiktoken
- Cost calculation and tracking

### RAG System Architecture

`references/rag_system_architecture.md` contains:

- RAG pipeline implementation with code
- Vector database comparison and integration
- Chunking strategies (fixed, semantic, recursive)
- Embedding model selection guide
- Hybrid search and reranking patterns

---

## Tools

### Model Deployment Pipeline

```bash
python scripts/model_deployment_pipeline.py --model model.pkl --target staging
```

Generates deployment artifacts: Dockerfile, Kubernetes manifests, health checks.

### RAG System Builder

```bash
python scripts/rag_system_builder.py --config rag_config.yaml --analyze
```

Scaffolds RAG pipeline with vector store integration and retrieval logic.

### ML Monitoring Suite

```bash
python scripts/ml_monitoring_suite.py --config monitoring.yaml --deploy
```

Sets up drift detection, alerting, and performance dashboards.

---

## Tech Stack

| Category | Tools |
|----------|-------|
| ML Frameworks | PyTorch, TensorFlow, Scikit-learn, XGBoost |
| LLM Frameworks | LangChain, LlamaIndex, DSPy |
| MLOps | MLflow, Weights & Biases, Kubeflow |
| Data | Spark, Airflow, dbt, Kafka |
| Deployment | Docker, Kubernetes, Triton |
| Databases | PostgreSQL, BigQuery, Pinecone, Redis |

More from alirezarezvani/claude-skills

SkillDescription
a11y-auditAccessibility audit skill for scanning, fixing, and verifying WCAG 2.2 Level A and AA compliance across React, Next.js, Vue, Angular, Svelte, and plain HTML codebases. Use when auditing accessibility, fixing a11y violations, checking color contrast, generating compliance reports, or integrating accessibility checks into CI/CD pipelines.
ab-test-setupWhen the user wants to plan, design, or implement an A/B test or experiment. Also use when the user mentions "A/B test," "split test," "experiment," "test this change," "variant copy," "multivariate test," "hypothesis," "conversion experiment," "statistical significance," or "test this." For tracking implementation, see analytics-tracking.
ad-creativeWhen the user needs to generate, iterate, or scale ad creative for paid advertising. Use when they say 'write ad copy,' 'generate headlines,' 'create ad variations,' 'bulk creative,' 'iterate on ads,' 'ad copy validation,' 'RSA headlines,' 'Meta ad copy,' 'LinkedIn ad,' or 'creative testing.' This is pure creative production — distinct from paid-ads (campaign strategy). Use ad-creative when you need the copy, not the campaign plan.
adversarial-reviewerAdversarial code review that breaks the self-review monoculture. Use when you want a genuinely critical review of recent changes, before merging a PR, or when you suspect Claude is being too agreeable about code quality. Forces perspective shifts through hostile reviewer personas that catch blind spots the author's mental model shares with the reviewer.
aeoAnswer Engine Optimization (AEO) skill — optimize content to be cited by AI language models (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, Mistral) as authoritative sources. Distinct from SEO — AEO optimizes for citation in LLM-generated responses, not search rankings. Use when planning content for AI-first search audiences, auditing existing content for E-E-A-T signals, tracking which pages get cited by which LLMs, or building a citation-friendly content strategy. Triggers — 'AEO audit', 'optimize for ChatGPT', 'get cited by Perplexity', 'LLM citation strategy', 'answer engine optimization', 'content for AI search', 'E-E-A-T audit'. Output is a markdown audit report (default) or JSON for pipeline integration. Stdlib-only Python tools.
agent-designerUse when the user asks to design a multi-agent system, pick an orchestration pattern (supervisor/swarm/pipeline), generate tool schemas for agents, or evaluate agent execution logs for cost, latency, and failure bottlenecks. Examples: 'design an agent architecture for research automation', 'generate Anthropic tool schemas from these tool descriptions', 'analyze these agent run logs for bottlenecks'. NOT for Claude Code workflow files (use workflow-builder) or single-agent prompt design (use agent-workflow-designer).
agent-protocolInter-agent communication protocol for C-suite agent teams. Defines invocation syntax, loop prevention, isolation rules, and response formats. Use when C-suite agents need to query each other, coordinate cross-functional analysis, or run board meetings with multiple agent roles.
agent-workflow-designerDesign production-grade multi-agent workflows with clear pattern choice (sequential, parallel, hierarchical), handoff contracts, failure handling, and cost/context controls. Use when architecting a multi-step agent pipeline, choosing between single-agent vs multi-agent approaches, or refactoring an LLM workflow that suffers from context bloat or unreliable handoffs.
agenthubMulti-agent collaboration plugin that spawns N parallel subagents competing on the same task via git worktree isolation. Agents work independently, results are evaluated by metric or LLM judge, and the best branch is merged. Use when: user wants multiple approaches tried in parallel — code optimization, content variation, research exploration, or any task that benefits from parallel competition. Requires: a git repo.
agile-product-ownerAgile product ownership for backlog management and sprint execution. Covers user story writing, acceptance criteria, sprint planning, and velocity tracking. Use when writing user stories, creating acceptance criteria, planning sprints, estimating story points, breaking down epics, or prioritizing the backlog.