gen-release-notes

$npx mdskill add existential-birds/beagle/gen-release-notes

Generate release notes for changes since a given tag

  • Identify and collect changes made after the specified tag in the repository.
  • Depends on Git commands to fetch commit history and diffs.
  • Analyzes commits, categorizes them into different types (e.g., bug fixes, feature additions), and generates release notes accordingly.
  • Provides formatted release notes that follow the Keep a Changelog standard.

SKILL.md

.github/skills/gen-release-notesView on GitHub ↗
---
name: gen-release-notes
description: generate release notes for changes since a given tag
disable-model-invocation: true
---

# Release Notes Generator

Generate professional release notes following the Keep a Changelog standard.

**Input**: Previous tag (e.g., `v0.0.1`)

```
$ARGUMENTS
```

---

Analyze the changes thoroughly before generating release notes.

## Gates

Do not invent tags, PR numbers, or links. Each row must pass before the work that depends on it.

| When | Pass condition (evidence) | On fail |
|------|---------------------------|---------|
| Before `git log` / `git diff` | `git tag -l "$PREV_TAG"` prints exactly one line matching `PREV_TAG` | Stop; report that the tag is missing—do not write changelog entries |
| Before categorizing | `git rev-parse "$PREV_TAG^{commit}"` exits 0 | Stop; fix `PREV_TAG` or repo checkout |
| If using `gh pr list` | Command exits 0 and JSON is valid | Fall back to commit subjects + merge-commit URLs only; do not fabricate PR numbers |
| After Step 5 footer edits | Step 6 footer-gate exits 0 (both `grep -q` checks pass against the staged `CHANGELOG.md`) | Re-run footer edits from Step 5, then re-run Step 6 until it exits 0 |

## Step 1: Gather Changes

Run these commands to collect information about changes since the provided tag:

```bash
# Store the previous tag
PREV_TAG="$ARGUMENTS"

# Gate: tag must exist (output must be non-empty and match PREV_TAG)
git tag -l "$PREV_TAG"
# If the line above prints nothing, STOP — do not continue below.

# Get the repo URL for PR links
git remote get-url origin

# List commits since last tag
git log ${PREV_TAG}..HEAD --pretty=format:"%h %s" --no-merges

# Get detailed diff stats
git diff ${PREV_TAG}..HEAD --stat

# List changed files by directory
git diff ${PREV_TAG}..HEAD --name-only | sort | uniq
```

Also gather PR information:

```bash
# Get merged PRs since the tag (requires gh CLI)
gh pr list --state merged --search "merged:>=$(git log -1 --format=%ci $PREV_TAG | cut -d' ' -f1)" --json number,title,author,labels
```

## Step 2: Analyze and Categorize

Categorize each change into exactly one of these groups (in this order):

| Category | Include | Exclude |
|----------|---------|---------|
| **Added** | New features, new public APIs, new CLI commands | Internal utilities not exposed to users |
| **Changed** | Modified behavior, performance improvements, updated dependencies with user impact | Refactors with no behavior change |
| **Deprecated** | Features marked for future removal | - |
| **Removed** | Deleted features, removed public APIs | Removed internal code |
| **Fixed** | Bug fixes, error handling improvements | Test-only fixes |
| **Security** | Vulnerability patches, security hardening | - |

**Exclude entirely:**
- CI/CD configuration changes (unless they affect users)
- Documentation-only changes (unless they reveal new features)
- Code style/formatting changes
- Test-only changes
- Internal refactors with no user-visible impact
- Merge commits

## Step 3: Determine Version Number

Based on the changes, suggest the next version following Semantic Versioning:
- **MAJOR** (X.0.0): Breaking changes to public API
- **MINOR** (x.Y.0): New features, backward-compatible
- **PATCH** (x.y.Z): Bug fixes only

Detect the tag format from existing tags (with or without `v` prefix).

## Step 4: Write Release Notes

Generate a `CHANGELOG.md` entry using this exact format:

```markdown
## [VERSION] - YYYY-MM-DD

### Added

- **scope:** Add new feature description ([#54](REPO_URL/pull/54))

### Changed

- **Breaking:** Rename `oldName()` to `newName()` for consistency ([#145](REPO_URL/pull/145))

  **Migration:** Replace all calls to `oldName()` with `newName()`.

### Deprecated

- **scope:** Deprecate `legacy_function()` in favor of `new_function()` ([#143](REPO_URL/pull/143))

### Removed

- **Breaking:** Remove deprecated `old_function()` ([#141](REPO_URL/pull/141))

### Fixed

- **scope:** Fix race condition when multiple workers access shared state ([#139](REPO_URL/pull/139))

### Security

- **deps:** Update vulnerable package to patched version ([#49](REPO_URL/pull/49))
```

### Writing Rules

**Format requirements:**
- Start every entry with an imperative verb: Add, Fix, Remove, Update, Improve, Rename, Deprecate, Patch
- Include scope prefix in bold when present: `**server:**`, `**cli:**`, `**api:**`
- One line per change (except breaking changes which get migration notes)
- Include PR/issue link at end of line
- Sort entries within each category by importance (most impactful first)
- Omit empty categories entirely

**Breaking changes:**
- Prefix with bold `**Breaking:**`
- List first within their category
- Add a `**Migration:**` block on the next line explaining exactly what users must change
- Include before/after code examples for API signature changes

**Tone:**
- Write for library consumers, not maintainers
- Focus on *what changed for users*, not *how it was implemented*
- Be specific—never write "various improvements" or "bug fixes"
- Each entry should be understandable without reading the PR

**Bad examples to avoid:**
```markdown
# BAD - Too vague
- Fixed bugs
- Performance improvements
- Updated dependencies

# BAD - Implementation-focused
- Refactored the internal state machine to use async/await

# BAD - Missing context
- Fixed #234
```

**Good examples to follow:**
```markdown
# GOOD - Specific and user-focused
- **server:** Fix timeout errors when processing files larger than 100MB ([#234](URL))
- **cli:** Add `--dry-run` flag to preview changes before execution ([#235](URL))
- **api:** Improve cold-start latency from 2.3s to 0.8s by lazy-loading plugins ([#236](URL))
```

## Step 5: Update CHANGELOG.md

1. If `CHANGELOG.md` exists:
   - Insert new version after the `## [Unreleased]` section (or at top if no Unreleased)

2. If `CHANGELOG.md` doesn't exist, create it with this header:
```markdown
# Changelog

All notable changes to this project will be documented in this file.

The format is based on [Keep a Changelog](https://keepachangelog.com/en/1.1.0/),
and this project adheres to [Semantic Versioning](https://semver.org/spec/v2.0.0.html).

## [Unreleased]

```

3. **Update the footer reference links at the bottom of the file.** This step is mandatory — CodeRabbit and other reviewers will flag the changelog as incomplete if these are missing. Two edits are required:

   a. **Advance `[Unreleased]`** so it compares against the new version instead of the previous one.
   b. **Insert a new `[NEW_VERSION]` line** right below `[Unreleased]`, comparing the previous tag to the new one.

   Example diff (releasing `3.2.0` after `3.1.0`):

   ```diff
   -[Unreleased]: https://github.com/OWNER/REPO/compare/v3.1.0...HEAD
   +[Unreleased]: https://github.com/OWNER/REPO/compare/v3.2.0...HEAD
   +[3.2.0]: https://github.com/OWNER/REPO/compare/v3.1.0...v3.2.0
    [3.1.0]: https://github.com/OWNER/REPO/compare/v3.0.0...v3.1.0
   ```

   After editing, run **Step 6** to verify both footer lines exist and are correct. Do not skip Step 6 — it is the hard gate that prevents the recurring "missing footer compare link" reviewer feedback.

## Step 6: Verify CHANGELOG footer compare links (HARD GATE)

This is the enforcement gate for footer compare links. It must run before `gen-release-notes` reports success and before any commit step in the release workflow. It is **not** advisory — both `grep -q` checks must exit 0 or the gate fails with a named missing line.

Run this block exactly:

```bash
# Read the staged CHANGELOG.md blob (index), not the working tree, so unstaged
# edits cannot make the gate pass when the commit would actually fail.
STAGED_CHANGELOG=$(git show :CHANGELOG.md)

# Extract NEW and PREV versions from the staged CHANGELOG.md.
# We only match numeric `## [X.Y.Z]` headings so `## [Unreleased]` is skipped.
NEW_VERSION=$(printf '%s\n' "$STAGED_CHANGELOG" | grep -m1 -E '^## \[[0-9]+\.[0-9]+\.[0-9]+\]' | sed -E 's/^## \[([0-9]+\.[0-9]+\.[0-9]+)\].*/\1/')
PREV_VERSION=$(printf '%s\n' "$STAGED_CHANGELOG" | grep -m2 -E '^## \[[0-9]+\.[0-9]+\.[0-9]+\]' | sed -n '2p' | sed -E 's/^## \[([0-9]+\.[0-9]+\.[0-9]+)\].*/\1/')

if [ -z "$NEW_VERSION" ] || [ -z "$PREV_VERSION" ]; then
  echo "GATE FAIL: could not extract NEW_VERSION ($NEW_VERSION) or PREV_VERSION ($PREV_VERSION) from staged CHANGELOG.md"
  exit 1
fi

# Infer optional tag prefix (`v` or empty) from the existing [Unreleased] footer.
# Step 3 explicitly allows tags with or without `v`; never hardcode `v` here.
# Fall back to `v` only when no [Unreleased] footer exists yet (first release).
TAG_PREFIX=$(printf '%s\n' "$STAGED_CHANGELOG" | sed -nE 's|^\[Unreleased\]: .*/compare/(v?)[0-9]+\.[0-9]+\.[0-9]+\.\.\.HEAD$|\1|p' | head -1)
if ! printf '%s\n' "$STAGED_CHANGELOG" | grep -qE '^\[Unreleased\]:'; then
  TAG_PREFIX="v"
fi

echo "Gating footer compare links: NEW=${TAG_PREFIX}${NEW_VERSION}, PREV=${TAG_PREFIX}${PREV_VERSION}"

# Escape dots so they match literally inside the regex.
NEW_RE=${NEW_VERSION//./\\.}
PREV_RE=${PREV_VERSION//./\\.}

# Check 1: the new [NEW_VERSION] footer line exists and points PREV->NEW.
printf '%s\n' "$STAGED_CHANGELOG" | grep -qE "^\[${NEW_RE}\]: .*compare/${TAG_PREFIX}${PREV_RE}\.\.\.${TAG_PREFIX}${NEW_RE}\$" \
  || { echo "GATE FAIL: missing footer line: [${NEW_VERSION}]: .../compare/${TAG_PREFIX}${PREV_VERSION}...${TAG_PREFIX}${NEW_VERSION}"; exit 1; }

# Check 2: the [Unreleased] footer line is advanced to compare from the new tag.
printf '%s\n' "$STAGED_CHANGELOG" | grep -qE "^\[Unreleased\]: .*compare/${TAG_PREFIX}${NEW_RE}\.\.\.HEAD\$" \
  || { echo "GATE FAIL: [Unreleased] is not advanced; expected: [Unreleased]: .../compare/${TAG_PREFIX}${NEW_VERSION}...HEAD"; exit 1; }

echo "Footer compare links verified: [${NEW_VERSION}] and [Unreleased] both present and correct."
```

**Pass condition (objective):** both `grep -q` invocations above exit 0 against the staged `CHANGELOG.md`. The block must print `Footer compare links verified: ...` and exit 0.

**On fail:** the gate names the missing or wrong line. Return to Step 5 and edit `CHANGELOG.md` to add or correct that line, then re-run this block. Do not proceed to Step 7 or report success until the block exits 0.

## Step 7: Output Summary

After updating the changelog, provide:
1. The suggested version number with rationale
2. Summary of categorized changes
3. Any breaking changes that need special attention
4. Confirmation that CHANGELOG.md was updated

## Conventional Commits Mapping

Map commit prefixes to changelog categories:

| Commit Prefix | Changelog Category |
|---------------|-------------------|
| `feat(scope):` | Added |
| `feat!(scope):` | Added (with Breaking prefix) |
| `fix(scope):` | Fixed |
| `perf(scope):` | Changed |
| `security(scope):` | Security |
| `docs:`, `chore:`, `ci:`, `test:`, `style:` | **Exclude** |

More from existential-birds/beagle

SkillDescription
adr-decision-extractionUse when you need to mine a conversation, session transcript, or design discussion for architectural decisions before writing ADRs. Identifies problem-solution pairs, trade-off debates, technology choices, and explicit \"[ADR]\" tags. Triggers on \"what decisions did we make\", \"extract decisions from this chat\", \"find the choices in our discussion\", or \"summarize architectural decisions\". Also useful after long planning sessions to capture decisions that were made implicitly. Does NOT write ADR documents \u2014 use adr-writing or write-adr for that.
adr-writingUse when writing or formatting an ADR document using the MADR template, applying Definition of Done (E.C.A.D.R.) criteria, or verifying ADR completeness. Triggers on \"write the ADR\", \"format as MADR\", \"check ADR quality\", \"mark gaps in ADR\". Also triggers when a decision has been extracted and needs to become a document. Does NOT extract decisions from conversations (use adr-decision-extraction) or orchestrate the full extract-confirm-write workflow (use write-adr).
agent-architecture-analysisUse when auditing an agent codebase against the 12-Factor Agents methodology, reviewing LLM-powered system architecture, or assessing agentic app compliance. Triggers on \"analyze agent architecture\", \"12-factor audit\", \"how compliant is this agent\", or \"evaluate this LLM app\". Also applies when comparing frameworks or planning agent improvements. Not for quick checklists \u2014 this performs deep per-factor codebase analysis with file-level evidence.
app-intents-code-reviewReviews App Intents code for intent structure, entities, shortcuts, and parameters. Use when reviewing code with import AppIntents, @AppIntent, AppEntity, AppShortcutsProvider, or @Parameter.
artifact-analysisUse when the user wants a cited, structured read of local documents and project knowledge. Triggers on: \"analyze these docs\", \"scan my project for context\", \"read the docs folder\", \"summarize what's in .beagle/concepts/\", \"extract context from docs/\", \"what's in this folder\", \"go read everything in X and tell me what's there\". Also invoked programmatically by other beagle skills (prfaq-beagle Ignition, brainstorm-beagle reference points, strategy-interview context grounding) via the companion contract. Does NOT trigger on codebase lookups (\"find this function\", \"search the repo\"), web research (use web-research), LLM-as-judge evaluation (use llm-judge), or document editing (use humanize-beagle). Produces a written scan plan, parallel-subagent findings, and a cited synthesis report on disk — never inline prose, never unsourced claims.
axum-code-reviewReviews axum web framework code for routing patterns, extractor usage, middleware, state management, and error handling. Use when reviewing Rust code that uses axum, tower, or hyper for HTTP services. Covers axum 0.7+ patterns including State, Path, Query, Json extractors.
brainstorm-beagleUse when the user has a fuzzy idea and wants to shape it into a concrete project spec before planning or building. Triggers on: \"brainstorm this\", \"I have an idea for...\", \"help me think through this project\", \"what should I build\", \"spec this out\". Also catches vague feature descriptions needing structured questioning to clarify scope. Does NOT write code, plan implementation, review strategy docs, or run strategy interviews \u2014 produces a WHAT/WHY spec through dialogue, not a HOW plan.
bubbletea-code-reviewReviews BubbleTea TUI code for proper Elm architecture, model/update/view patterns, and Lipgloss styling. Use when reviewing terminal UI code using charmbracelet/bubbletea.
cloudkit-code-reviewReviews CloudKit code for container setup, record handling, subscriptions, and sharing patterns. Use when reviewing code with import CloudKit, CKContainer, CKRecord, CKShare, or CKSubscription.
combine-code-reviewReviews Combine framework code for memory leaks, operator misuse, and error handling. Use when reviewing code with import Combine, AnyPublisher, @Published, PassthroughSubject, or CurrentValueSubject.