postgres-code-review

$npx mdskill add existential-birds/beagle/postgres-code-review

Reviews PostgreSQL code for indexing, JSONB, connections, and transactions.

  • Identifies missing indexes, wrong index types, and query performance issues.
  • Depends on reference guides for indexes, JSONB, connections, and transactions.
  • Uses a checklist to evaluate indexing, JSONB, pooling, and transaction safety.
  • Outputs findings with evidence from reference documents and review gates.

SKILL.md

.github/skills/postgres-code-reviewView on GitHub ↗
---
name: postgres-code-review
description: Reviews PostgreSQL code for indexing strategies, JSONB operations, connection pooling, and transaction safety. Use when reviewing SQL queries, database schemas, JSONB usage, or connection management.
---

# PostgreSQL Code Review

## Quick Reference

| Issue Type | Reference |
|------------|-----------|
| Missing indexes, wrong index type, query performance | [references/indexes.md](references/indexes.md) |
| JSONB queries, operators, GIN indexes | [references/jsonb.md](references/jsonb.md) |
| Connection leaks, pool configuration, timeouts | [references/connections.md](references/connections.md) |
| Isolation levels, deadlocks, advisory locks | [references/transactions.md](references/transactions.md) |

## Review Checklist

- [ ] WHERE/JOIN columns have appropriate indexes
- [ ] Composite indexes match query patterns (column order matters)
- [ ] JSONB columns use GIN indexes when queried
- [ ] Using proper JSONB operators (`->`, `->>`, `@>`, `?`)
- [ ] Connection pool configured with appropriate limits
- [ ] Connections properly released (context managers, try/finally)
- [ ] Appropriate transaction isolation level for use case
- [ ] No long-running transactions holding locks
- [ ] Advisory locks used for application-level coordination
- [ ] Queries use parameterized statements (no SQL injection)

## Gates (before reporting findings)

Use this sequence so conclusions stay evidence-bound (not “I checked mentally”):

1. **Scope** — Record the concrete paths (and line ranges or symbols if helpful) for the SQL, DDL/migrations, and connection code under review. **Pass:** every subsystem you critique (queries, JSONB, pool, transactions) has at least one cited path.
2. **SQL/DDL citation for performance claims** — Index, sequential-scan, JSONB-operator, and plan-related findings must point to the exact statement or schema (quoted excerpt or `file:line`). **Pass:** each such finding includes that citation.
3. **Binding check before injection flags** — Only assert SQL-injection risk after locating how SQL and values are combined (bound parameters vs string concat/format/f-strings). **Pass:** you name the mechanism you saw in code for each flagged callsite.

Then load the relevant reference doc from [Quick Reference](#quick-reference) and walk the [Review Checklist](#review-checklist).

## When to Load References

- Reviewing SELECT queries with WHERE/JOIN → indexes.md
- Reviewing JSONB columns or JSON operations → jsonb.md
- Reviewing database connection code → connections.md
- Reviewing BEGIN/COMMIT or concurrent updates → transactions.md

## Review Questions

1. Will this query use an index or perform a sequential scan?
2. Are JSONB operations using appropriate operators and indexes?
3. Are database connections properly managed and released?
4. Is the transaction isolation level appropriate for this operation?
5. Could this cause deadlocks or long-running locks?

More from existential-birds/beagle

SkillDescription
adr-decision-extractionUse when you need to mine a conversation, session transcript, or design discussion for architectural decisions before writing ADRs. Identifies problem-solution pairs, trade-off debates, technology choices, and explicit \"[ADR]\" tags. Triggers on \"what decisions did we make\", \"extract decisions from this chat\", \"find the choices in our discussion\", or \"summarize architectural decisions\". Also useful after long planning sessions to capture decisions that were made implicitly. Does NOT write ADR documents \u2014 use adr-writing or write-adr for that.
adr-writingUse when writing or formatting an ADR document using the MADR template, applying Definition of Done (E.C.A.D.R.) criteria, or verifying ADR completeness. Triggers on \"write the ADR\", \"format as MADR\", \"check ADR quality\", \"mark gaps in ADR\". Also triggers when a decision has been extracted and needs to become a document. Does NOT extract decisions from conversations (use adr-decision-extraction) or orchestrate the full extract-confirm-write workflow (use write-adr).
agent-architecture-analysisUse when auditing an agent codebase against the 12-Factor Agents methodology, reviewing LLM-powered system architecture, or assessing agentic app compliance. Triggers on \"analyze agent architecture\", \"12-factor audit\", \"how compliant is this agent\", or \"evaluate this LLM app\". Also applies when comparing frameworks or planning agent improvements. Not for quick checklists \u2014 this performs deep per-factor codebase analysis with file-level evidence.
app-intents-code-reviewReviews App Intents code for intent structure, entities, shortcuts, and parameters. Use when reviewing code with import AppIntents, @AppIntent, AppEntity, AppShortcutsProvider, or @Parameter.
artifact-analysisUse when the user wants a cited, structured read of local documents and project knowledge. Triggers on: \"analyze these docs\", \"scan my project for context\", \"read the docs folder\", \"summarize what's in .beagle/concepts/\", \"extract context from docs/\", \"what's in this folder\", \"go read everything in X and tell me what's there\". Also invoked programmatically by other beagle skills (prfaq-beagle Ignition, brainstorm-beagle reference points, strategy-interview context grounding) via the companion contract. Does NOT trigger on codebase lookups (\"find this function\", \"search the repo\"), web research (use web-research), LLM-as-judge evaluation (use llm-judge), or document editing (use humanize-beagle). Produces a written scan plan, parallel-subagent findings, and a cited synthesis report on disk — never inline prose, never unsourced claims.
axum-code-reviewReviews axum web framework code for routing patterns, extractor usage, middleware, state management, and error handling. Use when reviewing Rust code that uses axum, tower, or hyper for HTTP services. Covers axum 0.7+ patterns including State, Path, Query, Json extractors.
brainstorm-beagleUse when the user has a fuzzy idea and wants to shape it into a concrete project spec before planning or building. Triggers on: \"brainstorm this\", \"I have an idea for...\", \"help me think through this project\", \"what should I build\", \"spec this out\". Also catches vague feature descriptions needing structured questioning to clarify scope. Does NOT write code, plan implementation, review strategy docs, or run strategy interviews \u2014 produces a WHAT/WHY spec through dialogue, not a HOW plan.
bubbletea-code-reviewReviews BubbleTea TUI code for proper Elm architecture, model/update/view patterns, and Lipgloss styling. Use when reviewing terminal UI code using charmbracelet/bubbletea.
cloudkit-code-reviewReviews CloudKit code for container setup, record handling, subscriptions, and sharing patterns. Use when reviewing code with import CloudKit, CKContainer, CKRecord, CKShare, or CKSubscription.
combine-code-reviewReviews Combine framework code for memory leaks, operator misuse, and error handling. Use when reviewing code with import Combine, AnyPublisher, @Published, PassthroughSubject, or CurrentValueSubject.