pydantic-ai-dependency-injection

$npx mdskill add existential-birds/beagle/pydantic-ai-dependency-injection

Inject dependencies into PydanticAI agents via RunContext and deps_type.

  • Provides database connections, API clients, or user context to agents.
  • Uses dataclasses or Pydantic models to define dependency types.
  • Accesses dependencies through RunContext in tools and system prompts.
  • Passes dependencies at runtime when calling agent.run().

SKILL.md

.github/skills/pydantic-ai-dependency-injectionView on GitHub ↗
---
name: pydantic-ai-dependency-injection
description: Implement dependency injection in PydanticAI agents using RunContext and deps_type. Use when agents need database connections, API clients, user context, or any external resources.
---

# PydanticAI Dependency Injection

## Core Pattern

Dependencies flow through `RunContext`:

```python
from dataclasses import dataclass
from pydantic_ai import Agent, RunContext

@dataclass
class Deps:
    db: DatabaseConn
    api_client: HttpClient
    user_id: int

agent = Agent(
    'openai:gpt-4o',
    deps_type=Deps,  # Type for static analysis
)

@agent.tool
async def get_user_balance(ctx: RunContext[Deps]) -> float:
    """Get the current user's account balance."""
    return await ctx.deps.db.get_balance(ctx.deps.user_id)

# At runtime, provide deps
result = await agent.run(
    'What is my balance?',
    deps=Deps(db=db_conn, api_client=client, user_id=123)
)
```

## Defining Dependencies

Use dataclasses or Pydantic models:

```python
from dataclasses import dataclass
from pydantic import BaseModel

# Dataclass (recommended for simplicity)
@dataclass
class Deps:
    db: DatabaseConnection
    cache: CacheClient
    user_context: UserContext

# Pydantic model (if you need validation)
class Deps(BaseModel):
    api_key: str
    endpoint: str
    timeout: int = 30
```

## Accessing Dependencies

In tools and instructions:

```python
@agent.tool
async def query_database(ctx: RunContext[Deps], query: str) -> list[dict]:
    """Run a database query."""
    return await ctx.deps.db.execute(query)

@agent.instructions
async def add_user_context(ctx: RunContext[Deps]) -> str:
    user = await ctx.deps.db.get_user(ctx.deps.user_id)
    return f"User name: {user.name}, Role: {user.role}"

@agent.system_prompt
def add_permissions(ctx: RunContext[Deps]) -> str:
    return f"User has permissions: {ctx.deps.permissions}"
```

## Type Safety

Full type checking with generics:

```python
# Explicit agent type annotation
agent: Agent[Deps, OutputModel] = Agent(
    'openai:gpt-4o',
    deps_type=Deps,
    output_type=OutputModel,
)

# Now these are type-checked:
# - ctx.deps in tools is typed as Deps
# - result.output is typed as OutputModel
# - agent.run() requires deps: Deps
```

## No Dependencies Pattern

When you don't need dependencies:

```python
# Option 1: No deps_type (defaults to NoneType)
agent = Agent('openai:gpt-4o')
result = agent.run_sync('Hello')  # No deps needed

# Option 2: Explicit None for type checker
agent: Agent[None, str] = Agent('openai:gpt-4o')
result = agent.run_sync('Hello', deps=None)

# In tool_plain, no context access
@agent.tool_plain
def simple_calc(a: int, b: int) -> int:
    return a + b
```

## Complete Example

```python
from dataclasses import dataclass
from httpx import AsyncClient
from pydantic import BaseModel
from pydantic_ai import Agent, RunContext

@dataclass
class WeatherDeps:
    client: AsyncClient
    api_key: str

class WeatherReport(BaseModel):
    location: str
    temperature: float
    conditions: str

agent: Agent[WeatherDeps, WeatherReport] = Agent(
    'openai:gpt-4o',
    deps_type=WeatherDeps,
    output_type=WeatherReport,
    instructions='You are a weather assistant.',
)

@agent.tool
async def get_weather(
    ctx: RunContext[WeatherDeps],
    city: str
) -> dict:
    """Fetch weather data for a city."""
    response = await ctx.deps.client.get(
        f'https://api.weather.com/{city}',
        headers={'Authorization': ctx.deps.api_key}
    )
    return response.json()

async def main():
    async with AsyncClient() as client:
        deps = WeatherDeps(client=client, api_key='secret')
        result = await agent.run('Weather in London?', deps=deps)
        print(result.output.temperature)
```

## Override for Testing

```python
from pydantic_ai.models.test import TestModel

# Create mock dependencies
mock_deps = Deps(
    db=MockDatabase(),
    api_client=MockClient(),
    user_id=999
)

# Override model and deps for testing
with agent.override(model=TestModel(), deps=mock_deps):
    result = agent.run_sync('Test prompt')
```

## Gates

Run these in order before treating the agent as correct; each step has an objective pass condition.

1. **Deps cover every access** — Collect every `ctx.deps.<attr>` (and nested uses) from tools, `@agent.instructions`, and `@agent.system_prompt`. **Pass:** each `<attr>` exists on `deps_type` (and static checking passes if you use mypy/pyright on `Agent[DepsType, …]`).
2. **Every run that needs deps gets them** — **Pass:** each `agent.run` / `run_sync` path that executes those tools passes `deps=` whose type matches `deps_type` (no `None` unless the agent truly has no deps).
3. **Tests pin deps shape** — **Pass:** tests that use `agent.override` pass a `deps=` value with the same fields/types as production `Deps` (not a partial mock unless tools under test never touch missing fields).

## Best Practices

1. **Keep deps immutable**: Use frozen dataclasses or Pydantic models
2. **Pass connections, not credentials**: Deps should hold initialized clients
3. **Type your agents**: Use `Agent[DepsType, OutputType]` for full type safety
4. **Scope deps appropriately**: Create deps at the start of a request, close after

More from existential-birds/beagle

SkillDescription
adr-decision-extractionUse when you need to mine a conversation, session transcript, or design discussion for architectural decisions before writing ADRs. Identifies problem-solution pairs, trade-off debates, technology choices, and explicit \"[ADR]\" tags. Triggers on \"what decisions did we make\", \"extract decisions from this chat\", \"find the choices in our discussion\", or \"summarize architectural decisions\". Also useful after long planning sessions to capture decisions that were made implicitly. Does NOT write ADR documents \u2014 use adr-writing or write-adr for that.
adr-writingUse when writing or formatting an ADR document using the MADR template, applying Definition of Done (E.C.A.D.R.) criteria, or verifying ADR completeness. Triggers on \"write the ADR\", \"format as MADR\", \"check ADR quality\", \"mark gaps in ADR\". Also triggers when a decision has been extracted and needs to become a document. Does NOT extract decisions from conversations (use adr-decision-extraction) or orchestrate the full extract-confirm-write workflow (use write-adr).
agent-architecture-analysisUse when auditing an agent codebase against the 12-Factor Agents methodology, reviewing LLM-powered system architecture, or assessing agentic app compliance. Triggers on \"analyze agent architecture\", \"12-factor audit\", \"how compliant is this agent\", or \"evaluate this LLM app\". Also applies when comparing frameworks or planning agent improvements. Not for quick checklists \u2014 this performs deep per-factor codebase analysis with file-level evidence.
app-intents-code-reviewReviews App Intents code for intent structure, entities, shortcuts, and parameters. Use when reviewing code with import AppIntents, @AppIntent, AppEntity, AppShortcutsProvider, or @Parameter.
artifact-analysisUse when the user wants a cited, structured read of local documents and project knowledge. Triggers on: \"analyze these docs\", \"scan my project for context\", \"read the docs folder\", \"summarize what's in .beagle/concepts/\", \"extract context from docs/\", \"what's in this folder\", \"go read everything in X and tell me what's there\". Also invoked programmatically by other beagle skills (prfaq-beagle Ignition, brainstorm-beagle reference points, strategy-interview context grounding) via the companion contract. Does NOT trigger on codebase lookups (\"find this function\", \"search the repo\"), web research (use web-research), LLM-as-judge evaluation (use llm-judge), or document editing (use humanize-beagle). Produces a written scan plan, parallel-subagent findings, and a cited synthesis report on disk — never inline prose, never unsourced claims.
axum-code-reviewReviews axum web framework code for routing patterns, extractor usage, middleware, state management, and error handling. Use when reviewing Rust code that uses axum, tower, or hyper for HTTP services. Covers axum 0.7+ patterns including State, Path, Query, Json extractors.
brainstorm-beagleUse when the user has a fuzzy idea and wants to shape it into a concrete project spec before planning or building. Triggers on: \"brainstorm this\", \"I have an idea for...\", \"help me think through this project\", \"what should I build\", \"spec this out\". Also catches vague feature descriptions needing structured questioning to clarify scope. Does NOT write code, plan implementation, review strategy docs, or run strategy interviews \u2014 produces a WHAT/WHY spec through dialogue, not a HOW plan.
bubbletea-code-reviewReviews BubbleTea TUI code for proper Elm architecture, model/update/view patterns, and Lipgloss styling. Use when reviewing terminal UI code using charmbracelet/bubbletea.
cloudkit-code-reviewReviews CloudKit code for container setup, record handling, subscriptions, and sharing patterns. Use when reviewing code with import CloudKit, CKContainer, CKRecord, CKShare, or CKSubscription.
combine-code-reviewReviews Combine framework code for memory leaks, operator misuse, and error handling. Use when reviewing code with import Combine, AnyPublisher, @Published, PassthroughSubject, or CurrentValueSubject.