react-flow-code-review

$npx mdskill add existential-birds/beagle/react-flow-code-review

Reviews React Flow code for anti-patterns, performance issues, and best practices.

  • Identifies missing ReactFlowProvider or incorrect hook usage in component trees.
  • Depends on @xyflow/react, ReactFlow, useReactFlow, nodeTypes, and edgeTypes.
  • Checks for stable references, memo usage, and typed props in custom nodes/edges.
  • Reports findings with file paths and line numbers for each issue.

SKILL.md

.github/skills/react-flow-code-reviewView on GitHub ↗
---
name: react-flow-code-review
description: Reviews React Flow code for anti-patterns, performance issues, and best practices. Use when reviewing code that uses @xyflow/react, checking for common mistakes, or optimizing node-based UI implementations.
---

# React Flow Code Review

When reviewing React Flow code, complete the gates below in order. Each step has an objective pass condition before moving on.

## Review gates (sequenced)

1. **Locate flow code** — Search the review scope for `ReactFlow`, `ReactFlowProvider`, `useReactFlow`, `@xyflow/react`, `nodeTypes`, and `edgeTypes`. **Pass:** a short list of file paths (or explicit “none in scope” after searching).

2. **Provider boundary** — For each `useReactFlow()` (and other hooks that require the provider), trace the component tree to an enclosing `ReactFlowProvider`, or record a concrete mismatch with **file:line**.

3. **Stable types and memo surfaces** — For each custom node or edge component, note whether it uses `memo` and typed props (`NodeProps<...>`, etc.). For each `nodeTypes` / `edgeTypes` value passed into `<ReactFlow>`, confirm a stable reference (module scope, or `useMemo` with deps you can point to) or flag unstable recreation with **file:line**.

4. **Report with evidence** — For each finding you will deliver, record **file path and line number(s)** (or a minimal quoted snippet). **Pass:** no critical or high-severity issue is stated without that citation.

5. **Close the checklists** — Use [Performance Checklist](#performance-checklist) and [Common Mistakes](#common-mistakes); each item is **satisfied**, **not applicable** (with reason), or **open** with evidence. **Pass:** no item left silently ambiguous.

## Critical Anti-Patterns

### 1. Defining nodeTypes/edgeTypes Inside Components

**Problem**: Causes all nodes to re-mount on every render.

```tsx
// BAD - recreates object every render
function Flow() {
  const nodeTypes = { custom: CustomNode };  // WRONG
  return <ReactFlow nodeTypes={nodeTypes} />;
}

// GOOD - defined outside component
const nodeTypes = { custom: CustomNode };
function Flow() {
  return <ReactFlow nodeTypes={nodeTypes} />;
}

// GOOD - useMemo if dynamic
function Flow() {
  const nodeTypes = useMemo(() => ({ custom: CustomNode }), []);
  return <ReactFlow nodeTypes={nodeTypes} />;
}
```

### 2. Missing memo() on Custom Nodes/Edges

**Problem**: Custom components re-render on every parent update.

```tsx
// BAD - no memoization
function CustomNode({ data }: NodeProps) {
  return <div>{data.label}</div>;
}

// GOOD - wrapped in memo
import { memo } from 'react';
const CustomNode = memo(function CustomNode({ data }: NodeProps) {
  return <div>{data.label}</div>;
});
```

### 3. Inline Callbacks Without useCallback

**Problem**: Creates new function references, breaking memoization.

```tsx
// BAD - inline callback
<ReactFlow
  onNodesChange={(changes) => setNodes(applyNodeChanges(changes, nodes))}
/>

// GOOD - memoized callback
const onNodesChange = useCallback(
  (changes) => setNodes((nds) => applyNodeChanges(changes, nds)),
  []
);
<ReactFlow onNodesChange={onNodesChange} />
```

### 4. Using useReactFlow Outside Provider

```tsx
// BAD - will throw error
function App() {
  const { getNodes } = useReactFlow();  // ERROR: No provider
  return <ReactFlow ... />;
}

// GOOD - wrap in provider
function FlowContent() {
  const { getNodes } = useReactFlow();  // Works
  return <ReactFlow ... />;
}

function App() {
  return (
    <ReactFlowProvider>
      <FlowContent />
    </ReactFlowProvider>
  );
}
```

### 5. Storing Complex Objects in Node Data

**Problem**: Reference equality checks fail, causing unnecessary updates.

```tsx
// BAD - new object reference every time
setNodes(nodes.map(n => ({
  ...n,
  data: { ...n.data, config: { nested: 'value' } }  // New object each time
})));

// GOOD - use updateNodeData for targeted updates
const { updateNodeData } = useReactFlow();
updateNodeData(nodeId, { config: { nested: 'value' } });
```

## Performance Checklist

### Node Rendering

- [ ] Custom nodes wrapped in `memo()`
- [ ] nodeTypes defined outside component or memoized
- [ ] Heavy computations inside nodes use `useMemo`
- [ ] Event handlers use `useCallback`

### Edge Rendering

- [ ] Custom edges wrapped in `memo()`
- [ ] edgeTypes defined outside component or memoized
- [ ] Edge path calculations are not duplicated

### State Updates

- [ ] Using functional form of setState: `setNodes((nds) => ...)`
- [ ] Not spreading entire state for single property updates
- [ ] Using `updateNodeData` for data-only changes
- [ ] Batch updates when adding multiple nodes/edges

### Viewport

- [ ] Not calling `fitView()` on every render
- [ ] Using `fitViewOptions` for initial fit only
- [ ] Animation durations are reasonable (< 500ms)

## Common Mistakes

### Missing Container Height

```tsx
// BAD - no height, flow won't render
<ReactFlow nodes={nodes} edges={edges} />

// GOOD - explicit dimensions
<div style={{ width: '100%', height: '100vh' }}>
  <ReactFlow nodes={nodes} edges={edges} />
</div>
```

### Missing CSS Import

```tsx
// Required for default styles
import '@xyflow/react/dist/style.css';
```

### Forgetting nodrag on Interactive Elements

```tsx
// BAD - clicking button drags node
<button onClick={handleClick}>Click</button>

// GOOD - prevents drag
<button className="nodrag" onClick={handleClick}>Click</button>
```

### Not Using Position Constants

```tsx
// BAD - string literals
<Handle type="source" position="right" />

// GOOD - type-safe constants
import { Position } from '@xyflow/react';
<Handle type="source" position={Position.Right} />
```

### Mutating Nodes/Edges Directly

```tsx
// BAD - direct mutation
nodes[0].position = { x: 100, y: 100 };
setNodes(nodes);

// GOOD - immutable update
setNodes(nodes.map(n =>
  n.id === '1' ? { ...n, position: { x: 100, y: 100 } } : n
));
```

## TypeScript Issues

### Missing Generic Types

```tsx
// BAD - loses type safety
const [nodes, setNodes] = useNodesState(initialNodes);

// GOOD - explicit types
type MyNode = Node<{ value: number }, 'custom'>;
const [nodes, setNodes] = useNodesState<MyNode>(initialNodes);
```

### Wrong Props Type

```tsx
// BAD - using wrong type
function CustomNode(props: any) { ... }

// GOOD - correct props type
function CustomNode(props: NodeProps<MyNode>) { ... }
```

## Review Questions

1. Are all custom components memoized?
2. Are nodeTypes/edgeTypes defined outside render?
3. Are callbacks wrapped in useCallback?
4. Is the container sized properly?
5. Are styles imported?
6. Is useReactFlow used inside a provider?
7. Are interactive elements marked with nodrag?
8. Are types used consistently throughout?

More from existential-birds/beagle

SkillDescription
adr-decision-extractionUse when you need to mine a conversation, session transcript, or design discussion for architectural decisions before writing ADRs. Identifies problem-solution pairs, trade-off debates, technology choices, and explicit \"[ADR]\" tags. Triggers on \"what decisions did we make\", \"extract decisions from this chat\", \"find the choices in our discussion\", or \"summarize architectural decisions\". Also useful after long planning sessions to capture decisions that were made implicitly. Does NOT write ADR documents \u2014 use adr-writing or write-adr for that.
adr-writingUse when writing or formatting an ADR document using the MADR template, applying Definition of Done (E.C.A.D.R.) criteria, or verifying ADR completeness. Triggers on \"write the ADR\", \"format as MADR\", \"check ADR quality\", \"mark gaps in ADR\". Also triggers when a decision has been extracted and needs to become a document. Does NOT extract decisions from conversations (use adr-decision-extraction) or orchestrate the full extract-confirm-write workflow (use write-adr).
agent-architecture-analysisUse when auditing an agent codebase against the 12-Factor Agents methodology, reviewing LLM-powered system architecture, or assessing agentic app compliance. Triggers on \"analyze agent architecture\", \"12-factor audit\", \"how compliant is this agent\", or \"evaluate this LLM app\". Also applies when comparing frameworks or planning agent improvements. Not for quick checklists \u2014 this performs deep per-factor codebase analysis with file-level evidence.
app-intents-code-reviewReviews App Intents code for intent structure, entities, shortcuts, and parameters. Use when reviewing code with import AppIntents, @AppIntent, AppEntity, AppShortcutsProvider, or @Parameter.
artifact-analysisUse when the user wants a cited, structured read of local documents and project knowledge. Triggers on: \"analyze these docs\", \"scan my project for context\", \"read the docs folder\", \"summarize what's in .beagle/concepts/\", \"extract context from docs/\", \"what's in this folder\", \"go read everything in X and tell me what's there\". Also invoked programmatically by other beagle skills (prfaq-beagle Ignition, brainstorm-beagle reference points, strategy-interview context grounding) via the companion contract. Does NOT trigger on codebase lookups (\"find this function\", \"search the repo\"), web research (use web-research), LLM-as-judge evaluation (use llm-judge), or document editing (use humanize-beagle). Produces a written scan plan, parallel-subagent findings, and a cited synthesis report on disk — never inline prose, never unsourced claims.
axum-code-reviewReviews axum web framework code for routing patterns, extractor usage, middleware, state management, and error handling. Use when reviewing Rust code that uses axum, tower, or hyper for HTTP services. Covers axum 0.7+ patterns including State, Path, Query, Json extractors.
brainstorm-beagleUse when the user has a fuzzy idea and wants to shape it into a concrete project spec before planning or building. Triggers on: \"brainstorm this\", \"I have an idea for...\", \"help me think through this project\", \"what should I build\", \"spec this out\". Also catches vague feature descriptions needing structured questioning to clarify scope. Does NOT write code, plan implementation, review strategy docs, or run strategy interviews \u2014 produces a WHAT/WHY spec through dialogue, not a HOW plan.
bubbletea-code-reviewReviews BubbleTea TUI code for proper Elm architecture, model/update/view patterns, and Lipgloss styling. Use when reviewing terminal UI code using charmbracelet/bubbletea.
cloudkit-code-reviewReviews CloudKit code for container setup, record handling, subscriptions, and sharing patterns. Use when reviewing code with import CloudKit, CKContainer, CKRecord, CKShare, or CKSubscription.
combine-code-reviewReviews Combine framework code for memory leaks, operator misuse, and error handling. Use when reviewing code with import Combine, AnyPublisher, @Published, PassthroughSubject, or CurrentValueSubject.