react-router-code-review

$npx mdskill add existential-birds/beagle/react-router-code-review

Reviews React Router v6.4+ code for data loading, mutations, error handling, and navigation patterns.

  • Identifies misuse of useEffect for data loading instead of loaders.
  • Checks for proper use of Form, useFetcher, and action patterns.
  • Validates error boundaries and errorElement usage on routes.
  • Recommends Link over navigate and pending states via useNavigation.

SKILL.md

.github/skills/react-router-code-reviewView on GitHub ↗
---
name: react-router-code-review
description: Reviews React Router code for proper data loading, mutations, error handling, and navigation patterns. Use when reviewing React Router v6.4+ code, loaders, actions, or navigation logic.
---

# React Router Code Review

## Quick Reference

| Issue Type | Reference |
|------------|-----------|
| useEffect for data, missing loaders, params | [references/data-loading.md](references/data-loading.md) |
| Form vs useFetcher, action patterns | [references/mutations.md](references/mutations.md) |
| Missing error boundaries, errorElement | [references/error-handling.md](references/error-handling.md) |
| navigate() vs Link, pending states | [references/navigation.md](references/navigation.md) |

## Review Checklist

- [ ] Data loaded via `loader` not `useEffect`
- [ ] Route params accessed type-safely with validation
- [ ] Using `defer()` for parallel data fetching when appropriate
- [ ] Mutations use `<Form>` or `useFetcher` not manual fetch
- [ ] Actions handle both success and error cases
- [ ] Error boundaries with `errorElement` on routes
- [ ] Using `isRouteErrorResponse()` to check error types
- [ ] Navigation uses `<Link>` over `navigate()` where possible
- [ ] Pending states shown via `useNavigation()` or `fetcher.state`
- [ ] No navigation in render (only in effects or handlers)

## Valid Patterns (Do NOT Flag)

These patterns are correct React Router usage - do not report as issues:

- **useEffect for client-only data** - Loaders run server-side; localStorage, window dimensions, and browser APIs must use useEffect
- **navigate() in event handlers** - Link is for declarative navigation; navigate() is correct for imperative navigation in callbacks/handlers
- **Type annotation on loader data** - `useLoaderData<typeof loader>()` is a type annotation, not a type assertion
- **Empty errorElement at route level** - Route may intentionally rely on parent error boundary
- **Form without action prop** - Posts to current URL by convention; explicit action is optional
- **loader returning null** - Valid when data may not exist; null is a legitimate loader return value
- **Using fetcher.data without checking fetcher.state** - May be intentional when stale data is acceptable during revalidation

## Context-Sensitive Rules

Only flag these issues when the specific context applies:

| Issue | Flag ONLY IF |
|-------|--------------|
| Missing loader | Data is available server-side (not client-only) |
| useEffect for data fetching | Data is NOT client-only (localStorage, browser APIs, window size) |
| Missing errorElement | No parent route in the hierarchy has an error boundary |
| navigate() instead of Link | Navigation is NOT triggered by an event handler or conditional logic |

## Gates (before reporting any finding)

Run in order. **Pass each gate with evidence** (paths, line refs, or a one-line quote from code)—not intuition alone.

### Gate 1 — Scope the route surface

**Pass when:** You have repo path(s) to the route module, `routes` config entry, or layout that owns the behavior under review (write them in your notes before flagging).

### Gate 2 — Context-sensitive match

**Pass when:** For every issue that maps to **Context-Sensitive Rules**, the **Flag ONLY IF** condition is satisfied with a one-line rationale tied to the code; for other checklist items, you have a concrete code citation (path + line or short excerpt).

### Gate 3 — Non-issue patterns

**Pass when:** The behavior is not covered by **Valid Patterns (Do NOT Flag)** for that category.

### Gate 4 — Verification protocol

Load and follow [review-verification-protocol](../review-verification-protocol/SKILL.md). **Pass when:** Its pre-report checklist (and any issue-type subsection that applies) is complete for each finding you will output.

## When to Load References

- Reviewing data fetching code → data-loading.md
- Reviewing forms or mutations → mutations.md
- Reviewing error handling → error-handling.md
- Reviewing navigation logic → navigation.md

## Review Questions

1. Is data loaded in loaders instead of effects?
2. Are mutations using Form/action patterns?
3. Are there error boundaries at appropriate route levels?
4. Is navigation declarative with Link components?
5. Are pending states properly handled?

More from existential-birds/beagle

SkillDescription
adr-decision-extractionUse when you need to mine a conversation, session transcript, or design discussion for architectural decisions before writing ADRs. Identifies problem-solution pairs, trade-off debates, technology choices, and explicit \"[ADR]\" tags. Triggers on \"what decisions did we make\", \"extract decisions from this chat\", \"find the choices in our discussion\", or \"summarize architectural decisions\". Also useful after long planning sessions to capture decisions that were made implicitly. Does NOT write ADR documents \u2014 use adr-writing or write-adr for that.
adr-writingUse when writing or formatting an ADR document using the MADR template, applying Definition of Done (E.C.A.D.R.) criteria, or verifying ADR completeness. Triggers on \"write the ADR\", \"format as MADR\", \"check ADR quality\", \"mark gaps in ADR\". Also triggers when a decision has been extracted and needs to become a document. Does NOT extract decisions from conversations (use adr-decision-extraction) or orchestrate the full extract-confirm-write workflow (use write-adr).
agent-architecture-analysisUse when auditing an agent codebase against the 12-Factor Agents methodology, reviewing LLM-powered system architecture, or assessing agentic app compliance. Triggers on \"analyze agent architecture\", \"12-factor audit\", \"how compliant is this agent\", or \"evaluate this LLM app\". Also applies when comparing frameworks or planning agent improvements. Not for quick checklists \u2014 this performs deep per-factor codebase analysis with file-level evidence.
app-intents-code-reviewReviews App Intents code for intent structure, entities, shortcuts, and parameters. Use when reviewing code with import AppIntents, @AppIntent, AppEntity, AppShortcutsProvider, or @Parameter.
artifact-analysisUse when the user wants a cited, structured read of local documents and project knowledge. Triggers on: \"analyze these docs\", \"scan my project for context\", \"read the docs folder\", \"summarize what's in .beagle/concepts/\", \"extract context from docs/\", \"what's in this folder\", \"go read everything in X and tell me what's there\". Also invoked programmatically by other beagle skills (prfaq-beagle Ignition, brainstorm-beagle reference points, strategy-interview context grounding) via the companion contract. Does NOT trigger on codebase lookups (\"find this function\", \"search the repo\"), web research (use web-research), LLM-as-judge evaluation (use llm-judge), or document editing (use humanize-beagle). Produces a written scan plan, parallel-subagent findings, and a cited synthesis report on disk — never inline prose, never unsourced claims.
axum-code-reviewReviews axum web framework code for routing patterns, extractor usage, middleware, state management, and error handling. Use when reviewing Rust code that uses axum, tower, or hyper for HTTP services. Covers axum 0.7+ patterns including State, Path, Query, Json extractors.
brainstorm-beagleUse when the user has a fuzzy idea and wants to shape it into a concrete project spec before planning or building. Triggers on: \"brainstorm this\", \"I have an idea for...\", \"help me think through this project\", \"what should I build\", \"spec this out\". Also catches vague feature descriptions needing structured questioning to clarify scope. Does NOT write code, plan implementation, review strategy docs, or run strategy interviews \u2014 produces a WHAT/WHY spec through dialogue, not a HOW plan.
bubbletea-code-reviewReviews BubbleTea TUI code for proper Elm architecture, model/update/view patterns, and Lipgloss styling. Use when reviewing terminal UI code using charmbracelet/bubbletea.
cloudkit-code-reviewReviews CloudKit code for container setup, record handling, subscriptions, and sharing patterns. Use when reviewing code with import CloudKit, CKContainer, CKRecord, CKShare, or CKSubscription.
combine-code-reviewReviews Combine framework code for memory leaks, operator misuse, and error handling. Use when reviewing code with import Combine, AnyPublisher, @Published, PassthroughSubject, or CurrentValueSubject.