mcp-release-qa

$npx mdskill add github/awesome-copilot/mcp-release-qa

Verifies MCP servers before release via real protocol sessions and evidence.

  • Solves the problem of untested runtime behavior and contract drift before shipping.
  • Depends on a fresh server process, MCP protocol clients, and source registrations.
  • Decides by comparing runtime capabilities against source and public documentation.
  • Delivers reproducible evidence with exact commands and raw responses.

SKILL.md

.github/skills/mcp-release-qaView on GitHub ↗
---
name: mcp-release-qa
description: 'Verify an MCP server before release by exercising a real protocol session, comparing runtime capabilities with source and documentation, testing failure paths, and recording reproducible evidence. Use when shipping or reviewing an MCP server, tool, resource, prompt, catalog, or install path.'
---

# MCP Release QA

Test the server that users will run. A schema review or a passing unit test is
not runtime evidence.

This skill complements security review. It focuses on protocol behavior,
published-contract drift, transport correctness, and reproducible release
evidence.

## Rules

- Run checks against a fresh server process built from the candidate revision.
- Keep `initialize`, `notifications/initialized`, discovery, and invocation in
  the same session. A new process is a new STDIO session.
- Treat source registrations as implementation truth and public documentation
  as a contract that must match it.
- Record exact commands and raw responses. Do not replace missing evidence with
  "looks correct."
- Do not invoke mutation-capable tools against production data. Use fixtures, a
  sandbox, or stop and name the missing safe test environment.
- Derive the expected capability inventory from the candidate source on every
  run.

## 1. Establish the release surface

Identify:

- candidate commit and build command;
- server entry point and transport: STDIO, Streamable HTTP, or SSE;
- supported MCP protocol versions;
- source files that register tools, resources, resource templates, and prompts;
- generated catalogs, manifests, README tables, and install instructions;
- existing protocol, integration, and smoke-test commands.

Prefer repository-native commands. Inspect `package.json`, `pyproject.toml`,
`Makefile`, CI workflows, and contributor instructions before inventing a test
harness.

## 2. Start a clean server

Build the candidate and start the documented entry point with test-safe
configuration. Capture:

- the exact command;
- commit SHA;
- environment variable names, with values redacted;
- stdout, stderr, and exit status;
- the endpoint or child-process transport used by the client.

For STDIO, stdout is protocol-only. Logs, banners, and stack traces belong on
stderr. For HTTP transports, record the status, relevant MCP headers, and
session identifier handling without printing credentials.

If the server cannot start from its documented instructions, report that as a
release failure and preserve the startup error verbatim.

## 3. Exercise one complete session

Run this sequence through a real MCP client or the repository's integration
harness:

1. `initialize` with a protocol version the server claims to support.
2. Confirm the negotiated version and advertised capabilities.
3. Send `notifications/initialized`.
4. Call `ping`.
5. Call each supported discovery method:
   - `tools/list`
   - `resources/list`
   - `resources/templates/list`
   - `prompts/list`
6. Exercise at least one representative read-only item from every advertised
   capability class.
7. Follow pagination until no cursor remains when a list method is paginated.

Do not send post-initialization requests through separate one-shot processes.
That accidentally tests several incomplete sessions instead of one valid
session.

## 4. Prove inventory parity

Build four inventories from current evidence:

| Surface | Evidence |
|---|---|
| Source | Registered tool, resource, template, and prompt definitions |
| Runtime | Results from the live discovery methods |
| Generated metadata | Catalogs, manifests, or generated indexes |
| Documentation | README, reference pages, and install output |

Compare by stable identifier. Report:

- source entries missing at runtime;
- runtime entries absent from metadata or documentation;
- stale names, descriptions, arguments, URIs, or prompt parameters;
- documented install commands that do not start the candidate server.

Regenerate derived files with the repository's own build command, then fail if
the working tree still contains unexplained generated changes.

## 5. Check published contracts

For every discovered item, verify the runtime definition against its source:

### Tools

- Name and description are stable and specific.
- `inputSchema` defines types, required fields, enums, and bounds where needed.
- Unknown properties are rejected when the tool contract is closed.
- Mutation, idempotence, read-only, and open-world annotations match behavior.
- Successful calls conform to `outputSchema` when one is published.
- Errors are protocol errors or structured tool failures, not leaked stack
  traces.

### Resources and templates

- URIs and MIME types match the registered definitions.
- Static resources are readable.
- Template parameters are validated before resolution.
- Missing or forbidden resources fail explicitly.

### Prompts

- Required and optional arguments match discovery output.
- `prompts/get` returns usable messages for valid arguments.
- Missing required arguments and unknown prompt names fail explicitly.

## 6. Test failure paths

At minimum, probe:

- a request before initialization completes;
- malformed JSON or an invalid JSON-RPC envelope;
- an unknown method;
- an unsupported protocol version;
- repeated initialization;
- unknown tool, resource, and prompt names;
- missing, extra, wrong-type, and out-of-bounds arguments;
- a request at the documented transport-size limit and one beyond it;
- a controlled internal failure with credentials and stack traces redacted.

Verify that each response has the correct request ID, a useful error message,
and no successful side effect. For STDIO, also confirm every stdout line is a
complete protocol message and a healthy session leaves stderr clean unless the
server explicitly documents diagnostic output.

## 7. Smoke-test installation

When the project publishes an install command:

1. Create a temporary destination outside the source checkout.
2. Run the public install command exactly as documented.
3. Start the installed artifact without relying on files from the source tree.
4. Repeat initialization, discovery, and one read-only invocation.
5. Remove the temporary destination after preserving the command output.

An install string that was only inspected is unverified.

## 8. Report the evidence

Use this format:

```markdown
# MCP Release QA

Candidate: [commit]
Transport: [STDIO | Streamable HTTP | SSE]
Verdict: PASS | PASS WITH CAVEATS | FAIL

## Commands and results
- `[exact command]` — [exit status and result]

## Session transcript
- initialize: [result]
- discovery: [result]
- representative calls: [result]
- negative paths: [result]

## Parity
| Identifier | Source | Runtime | Metadata | Docs | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|

## Findings
| Severity | Evidence | Impact | Narrowest fix |
|---|---|---|---|

## Missing evidence
- [check that could not run and why]
```

Use `FAIL` for a server that cannot start, complete a valid session, keep the
transport parseable, or safely reject invalid input. Use `PASS WITH CAVEATS`
only for bounded documentation or metadata drift that does not misrepresent a
dangerous capability. Otherwise use `PASS`.

More from github/awesome-copilot

SkillDescription
acquire-codebase-knowledgeUse this skill when the user explicitly asks to map, document, or onboard into an existing codebase. Trigger for prompts like "map this codebase", "document this architecture", "onboard me to this repo", or "create codebase docs". Do not trigger for routine feature implementation, bug fixes, or narrow code edits unless the user asks for repository-level discovery.
acreadiness-assessRun the AgentRC readiness assessment on the current repository and produce a static HTML dashboard at reports/index.html. Wraps `npx github:microsoft/agentrc readiness` and hands off rendering to the @ai-readiness-reporter custom agent. Supports policies (--policy) for org-specific scoring. Use when asked to assess, audit, or score the AI readiness of a repo.
acreadiness-generate-instructionsGenerate tailored AI agent instruction files via AgentRC instructions command. Produces .github/copilot-instructions.md (default, recommended for Copilot in VS Code) plus optional per-area .instructions.md files with applyTo globs for monorepos. Use after running /acreadiness-assess to close gaps in the AI Tooling pillar.
acreadiness-policyHelp the user pick, write, or apply an AgentRC policy. Policies customise readiness scoring by disabling irrelevant checks, overriding impact/level, setting pass-rate thresholds, or chaining org baselines with team overrides. Use when the user asks about strict mode, AI-only scoring, custom weights, CI gating, or wants org-wide standardisation.
ad-campaign-analyzerUse this skill when the user shares ad campaign performance data and asks what to cut, scale, or test. Trigger for prompts like "analyze my ad campaigns", "where am I wasting ad spend", "reallocate my ad budget", "which ads are actually working", or "ROAS analysis". Do not trigger for campaign planning or creative generation without performance data.
add-educational-comments'Add educational comments to the file specified, or prompt asking for file to comment if one is not provided.'
adobe-illustrator-scriptingWrite, debug, and optimize Adobe Illustrator automation scripts using ExtendScript (JavaScript/JSX). Use when creating or modifying scripts that manipulate documents, layers, paths, text frames, colors, symbols, artboards, or any Illustrator DOM objects. Covers the complete JavaScript object model, coordinate system, measurement units, export workflows, and scripting best practices.
agent-governance|
agent-owasp-compliance|
agent-skill-stackFind, evaluate, and assemble the smallest compatible set of AI Agent Skills for an end-to-end natural-language goal. Use when a user wants Skills for a multi-step workflow, asks which Skills fit a project, needs an installed-Skill audit or conflict check, has low Skill recall, wants indirect helpers such as humanizers or compliance checks, or wants a project-specific Skill Stack with controlled installation. Search local Skills, registries, GitHub, and OpenCLI; compare adoption, verified fit, safety, and overlap. Do not use for locating one known or common Skill; use the generic find-skills workflow.