vendor-evaluation
$
npx mdskill add mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills/vendor-evaluationProduces a structured vendor evaluation framework — from defining criteria through to a scored comparison and recommendation.
SKILL.md
.github/skills/vendor-evaluationView on GitHub ↗
--- name: vendor-evaluation description: "Create a structured vendor evaluation framework for any procurement decision. Use when asked to evaluate vendors, compare suppliers, run an RFP scoring process, or assess a software or service provider. Produces a weighted scorecard, evaluation criteria, and recommendation framework." --- # Vendor Evaluation Skill Produces a structured vendor evaluation framework — from defining criteria through to a scored comparison and recommendation. ## Required Inputs - **What you are procuring** - **Vendors being evaluated** (minimum 2) - **Key decision criteria** (if known) - **Decision makers** - **Budget range** - **Timeline to decide** ## Output Structure ### 1. Evaluation Criteria and Weights | Category | Weight | Rationale | |---|---|---| | Functional fit | [%] | Does it do what we need? | | Commercial terms | [%] | Price, flexibility, payment | | Implementation | [%] | How hard to get started? | | Support and SLA | [%] | What happens when things go wrong? | | Security and compliance | [%] | Meets regulatory requirements? | | Vendor stability | [%] | Will this company exist in 3 years? | | References | [%] | Who else uses this? | Weights must total 100%. ### 2. Scoring Rubric - 5: Exceeds requirements — clear best-in-class - 4: Meets requirements — fully satisfies with minor gaps - 3: Partially meets — notable gaps requiring workarounds - 2: Significant gaps — would require workarounds - 1: Does not meet — cannot satisfy requirement ### 3. Vendor Scorecard | Criterion | Weight | [Vendor A] | Weighted | [Vendor B] | Weighted | [Vendor C] | Weighted | |---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---| | Functional fit | [%] | /5 | | /5 | | /5 | | | [Continue...] | | | | | | | | | **Total** | 100% | | **/5** | | **/5** | | **/5** | ### 4. Key Questions for Every Vendor Functional: Walk through [most critical use case]. What can your product not do that customers ask for? Commercial: What is included vs add-ons? Contract minimum term and notice period? Price protection at renewal? Implementation: Typical implementation for our size? What do you need from our team? Support: SLA for critical issues? Support included vs charged extra? Security: ISO 27001 / SOC 2 certified? Where is data stored? Breach notification process? ### 5. Reference Check Questions - How long using [vendor]? Implementation surprises? Support responsiveness? One thing you wish you had known? Would you choose them again? ### 6. Recommendation **Recommended vendor:** [Name] | **Score:** [X/5] **Rationale:** [Specific strengths that matter for this decision] **Key risks:** [Risk and mitigation] **Conditions:** [Contract terms to negotiate before signing] **Runner-up:** [Vendor and why they lost] ## Quality Checks - [ ] Evaluation criteria weights total 100% - [ ] Scoring rubric is defined before scoring vendors (not post-hoc) - [ ] Reference check questions are included - [ ] Recommendation includes risks and conditions, not just a winner - [ ] Runner-up rationale explains why they lost (enables future conversations) - [ ] Contract terms to negotiate are specified ## Example Trigger Phrases - "Help me evaluate vendors for [procurement]" - "Create a vendor scorecard for [software/service]" - "Compare [Vendor A] vs [Vendor B] for [use case]"