monte-carlo-asset-health

$npx mdskill add monte-carlo-data/mc-agent-toolkit/monte-carlo-asset-health

Monitor data asset health using Monte Carlo observability.

  • Diagnoses freshness, alerts, coverage, importance, and dependency issues.
  • Depends on Monte Carlo platform for observability data.
  • Reads reference files to define tool calls and parameters.
  • Delivers structured health reports covering asset reliability.

SKILL.md

.github/skills/monte-carlo-asset-healthView on GitHub ↗
---
name: monte-carlo-asset-health
description: Check the health of a data table/asset using Monte Carlo. Activates on "how is table X", "check health of X", "is X healthy", "status of X", "check on X table", or any health/status question about a data asset.
bucket: Trust
version: 1.0.0
---

# Monte Carlo Asset Health Skill

This skill checks the health of a data asset using Monte Carlo's observability
platform. It produces a structured health report covering freshness, alerts,
monitoring coverage, importance, and upstream dependency health.

## REQUIRED: Read reference files before executing

**You MUST read both reference files using the Read tool before making any MCP
tool calls.** These files are the source of truth for tool calls, parameters,
and response interpretation. This file only defines when to activate and how to
format the output.

1. `references/workflows.md` (relative to this file) — exact tool calls, phases, and execution order
2. `references/parameters.md` (relative to this file) — parameter conventions and field details

**Do NOT make any MCP tool calls until you have read both files.**

## When to activate this skill

Activate when the user:

- Asks about health: "how is table X doing?", "check health of X", "is X healthy?"
- Asks about status: "what's the status of X?", "status of orders table"
- Asks to check on a table: "check on X table", "check on X"
- Asks about reliability, freshness, or quality of a specific asset
- References a table in context of incident triage or change planning

## When NOT to activate this skill

- **Profiling or exploring table data** (row counts, column stats, distributions) → use `explore-table`
- **Creating or suggesting monitors** → use `monitoring-advisor`
- **Active incident triage** (investigating root cause of a firing alert) → use prevent skill Workflow 3

## Health report format

**CRITICAL: Only report data returned by the tools defined in `references/workflows.md`.
Do NOT call additional tools, do NOT infer or fabricate metrics. Each row below
specifies exactly which tool provides its value.**

**All sections (Active Alerts, Monitors, Upstream Issues, Recommendations) must
always appear with their heading.** Never omit a section — if there is no data,
show the empty-state text defined below.

**Never use emoji shortcodes** (like `:warning:` or `:arrow_up:`). Use Unicode
emoji characters directly (like ⚠️) or plain text. Shortcodes render as raw text
in the terminal.

**Always display URLs as bare URLs**, never as markdown links (e.g., `[text](url)`).

**`{MC_WEBAPP_URL}` appears throughout this template.** Every occurrence must be
replaced with the actual value returned by calling `get_mc_webapp_url()`. Never
hardcode or guess this URL — it varies by environment.

Present results in this structure:

```
## Health Check: <table_name>

**Tags:** `tag1:value1`, `tag2:value2` (or "None" if no tags)
**Link:** {MC_WEBAPP_URL}/assets/{mcon}
**Warehouse:** snowflake-prod (Snowflake)
**Status: 🟢 Healthy / 🟡 Degraded / 🔴 Unhealthy** | **Importance:** 0.85 (key asset ⭐️)
**Avg Reads/Day:** ~538 | **Avg Writes/Day:** ~12

| Metric        | Value                          | Signal |
|---------------|--------------------------------|--------|
| Last Activity | Apr 6, 2025                    | 🟢 Recent    |
| Alerts        | 2 active                       | 🔴 Has alerts |
| Monitoring    | 3 active monitors              | 🟢 Monitored  |
| Upstream      | 1/3 sources unhealthy          | 🔴 Issues     |

### Active Alerts

| Date  | Type           | Priority | Status           | Link                                                    |
|-------|----------------|----------|------------------|---------------------------------------------------------|
| Apr 8 | Metric anomaly | P3       | Not acknowledged | {MC_WEBAPP_URL}/alerts/{alert_uuid} |
| Apr 7 | Freshness      | P2       | Acknowledged     | {MC_WEBAPP_URL}/alerts/{alert_uuid} |

If there are more than 5 active alerts, display only 5. Do NOT put the overflow
message inside the table as a row. Instead, put it as plain text on the line
immediately after the table:

There are N more alerts not shown for brevity

If there are zero active alerts, show:
No active alerts in the last 7 days.

### Monitors

| Type        | Name                                    | Incidents (7d) | Status              |
|-------------|-----------------------------------------|----------------|---------------------|
| TABLE       | Orders freshness and schema             | 3              | Running hourly      |
| METRIC      | Revenue row count                       | 0              | Never executed      |
| BULK_METRIC | Warehouse volume check                  | 21             | ⚠️ 1 table has errors |

If there are zero monitors, show:
No monitors configured for this table.

### Upstream Issues
- raw_orders — FRESHNESS alert: not updated in 8h
- raw_payments — healthy
- dim_customers — healthy

> Want me to check further upstream for **raw_orders**?

If there are no upstream dependencies, show:
No upstream dependencies found.

### Diagnosis

1-2 sentences summarizing what is causing the table to be unhealthy, or
confirming it is healthy. This should naturally lead into the recommendations.

Example (unhealthy):
Upstream table raw_orders has not been updated in 8 hours, which is likely
causing staleness in this table. There are also 2 unacknowledged alerts.

Example (healthy):
Table is healthy — no active alerts, monitored, and all upstream sources
are in good shape.

### Recommendations
- Investigate upstream raw_orders freshness — likely root cause of this table's staleness
- Acknowledge or investigate the 2 active alerts

If there are no recommendations, show:
No recommendations — table looks healthy.

```

### Metric definitions — exact data sources

Each metric row MUST use only the specified data source. Do not add, infer, or
embellish values beyond what the tool returns.

| Metric | Data source | What to show | Signal |
|--------|------------|-------------|--------|
| **Last Activity** | `get_table` → `last_activity` | Date of last activity (e.g., "Apr 6, 2025") | 🟢 Recent (within 7 days) / 🟡 Stale (older than 7 days) |
| **Alerts** | `get_alerts` → count | "N active" or "No active alerts" | 🔴 Has alerts / 🟢 No alerts |
| **Monitoring** | `get_monitors` → count where `is_paused` is false | "N active monitors" or "0 active monitors (M paused)". Include relevant details from monitor fields (incident counts, error counts, types). | 🟢 Monitored (≥1 active) / 🔴 Unmonitored (0 active) |
| **Upstream** | `get_asset_lineage` (upstream) + Phase 3 checks | "N/M sources unhealthy" or "All N sources healthy" | 🔴 Issues (any unhealthy) / 🟢 Healthy (all healthy) |

**Importance** is shown next to the Status line (not in the metrics table). Source:
`get_table` → `importance_score` + `is_important`. Show "X.XX (key asset ⭐️)" if
key asset or importance > 0.8, otherwise just "X.XX".

**Avg Reads/Day** and **Avg Writes/Day** are shown below the Status line. Source:
`get_table` → `table_stats.avg_reads_per_active_day` and `table_stats.avg_writes_per_active_day`.

**Do NOT include downstream data.** This skill only queries upstream lineage.

### Status determination

- **🔴 Unhealthy:** Any active alerts on the asset (from `get_alerts` with statuses `["NOT_ACKNOWLEDGED", "ACKNOWLEDGED", "WORK_IN_PROGRESS"]` — see `parameters.md`)
- **🟡 Degraded:** No active alerts, but 0 active monitors on a high-importance
  asset (importance > 0.8 or key asset)
- **🟢 Healthy:** No active alerts and has at least 1 active monitor

### Tags

Display tags from the `search` tool's `properties` field. Show as inline badges:
`key:value`. If no tags exist, show "None". Always include the Tags line.

### Warehouse

Display the warehouse name and type from the `search` result. Always include this line.

### Recommendations

Only include recommendations derivable from collected data:
- Upstream health issues that may be root causes
- Active alerts that need acknowledgment or investigation
- Do NOT recommend specific monitor types — that is outside this skill's scope

More from monte-carlo-data/mc-agent-toolkit

SkillDescription
automated-triageTriage Monte Carlo alerts interactively or build an automated workflow. Fetch, score, and troubleshoot alerts using MCP tools now, or design a reusable workflow that runs on a schedule.
connection-auth-rulesBuild a Connection Auth Rules for a Monte Carlo connection type. Fetches live connector schemas and transform steps from the apollo-agent repo.
generate-validation-notebookGenerate SQL validation notebooks for dbt changes. Pass a GitHub PR URL or local dbt repo path.
monte-carlo-analyze-root-cause|
monte-carlo-context-detectionRoute data-related requests to the right Monte Carlo skill or workflow. USE WHEN alerts, incidents, data broken, stale, coverage gaps, data quality, or any ambiguous data observability request.
monte-carlo-incident-responseOrchestrate incident response — triage, root cause, remediate, prevent recurrence. USE WHEN active alerts, data broken, stale, pipeline failure, or investigate and fix a data incident.
monte-carlo-instrument-agentInstrument a new AI agent in a Python codebase for Monte Carlo Agent Observability. Detects AI libraries, installs the Monte Carlo OpenTelemetry SDK, and proposes tracing setup and decorator placements as diffs. Asks before editing any file.
monte-carlo-manage-macCreate, edit, validate, and import Monitors-as-Code YAML files. CLI-first; falls back to MC MCP tools, then manual validation.
monte-carlo-monitoring-advisorAnalyze data coverage, create monitors for warehouse tables and AI agents. Covers coverage gaps, use-case analysis, data monitor creation, and agent observability.
monte-carlo-performance-diagnosis|