arckit-platform-design
$
npx mdskill add tractorjuice/arc-kit/arckit-platform-designDesign multi-sided platform strategies using eight PDT canvases.
- Generates comprehensive strategy documents for complex ecosystem architectures.
- Requires PRIN and REQ artifacts to validate governance and requirements.
- Applies PDT v2.2.1 methodology to map entity portraits and transactions.
- Outputs structured design documents covering all eight strategy canvases.
SKILL.md
.github/skills/arckit-platform-designView on GitHub ↗
---
name: arckit-platform-design
description: "Create platform strategy using Platform Design Toolkit (8 canvases for multi-sided ecosystems)"
---
You are helping an enterprise architect design a **platform strategy** for a multi-sided ecosystem using the **Platform Design Toolkit (PDT)** from Boundaryless.io.
## User Input
```text
$ARGUMENTS
```
## Your Task
Generate a comprehensive platform strategy design document using PDT v2.2.1 methodology, covering all 8 strategy design canvases: Ecosystem Canvas, Entity Portraits, Motivations Matrix, Transactions Board, Learning Engine, Platform Experience Canvas, MVP Canvas, and Platform Design Canvas.
---
## Instructions
### Step 0: Read Available Documents
> **Note**: Before generating, scan `projects/` for existing project directories. For each project, list all `ARC-*.md` artifacts, check `external/` for reference documents, and check `000-global/` for cross-project policies. If no external docs exist but they would improve output, ask the user.
**MANDATORY** (warn if missing):
- **PRIN** (Architecture Principles, in 000-global) — Extract: Platform governance principles, ecosystem orchestration standards, technology choices
- If missing: STOP — platform designs require architecture principles. Run `$arckit-principles` first.
- **REQ** (Requirements) — Extract: Platform capabilities from FR/NFR requirements, scalability, availability, security
- If missing: warn user to run `$arckit-requirements` first
**RECOMMENDED** (read if available, note if missing):
- **STKE** (Stakeholder Analysis) — Extract: Ecosystem entities from stakeholder drivers, user personas, goals
- If missing: recommend running `$arckit-stakeholders` for better entity portraits
- **WARD** (Wardley Maps, in wardley-maps/) — Extract: Evolution analysis for build vs buy decisions, component positioning
**OPTIONAL** (read if available, skip silently if missing):
- **RISK** (Risk Register) — Extract: Platform risks, ecosystem risks, governance risks
- **DATA** (Data Model) — Extract: Data exchange patterns, entity schemas, data governance
- **SOBC** (Business Case) — Extract: Investment context, ROI targets, benefits
---
### Step 1: Identify or Create Project
Identify the target project from the hook context. If the user specifies a project that doesn't exist yet, create a new project:
1. Use Glob to list `projects/*/` directories and find the highest `NNN-*` number (or start at `001` if none exist)
2. Calculate the next number (zero-padded to 3 digits, e.g., `002`)
3. Slugify the project name (lowercase, replace non-alphanumeric with hyphens, trim)
4. Use the Write tool to create `projects/{NNN}-{slug}/README.md` with the project name, ID, and date — the Write tool will create all parent directories automatically
5. Also create `projects/{NNN}-{slug}/external/README.md` with a note to place external reference documents here
6. Set `PROJECT_ID` = the 3-digit number, `PROJECT_PATH` = the new directory path
If the project already exists, check for existing `ARC-{PROJECT_ID}-PLAT-v*.md` files. If found, ask user if they want to overwrite or update.
**Gathering rules** (apply to all user questions in this command):
- Ask the most important question first; fill in secondary details from context or reasonable defaults.
- **Maximum 2 rounds of questions total.** After that, infer the best answer from available context.
- If still ambiguous after 2 rounds, make a reasonable choice and note: *"I went with [X] — easy to adjust if you prefer [Y]."*
---
### Step 2: Read the Template
Read the platform design template:
**Read the template** (with user override support):
- **First**, check if `.arckit/templates/platform-design-template.md` exists in the project root
- **If found**: Read the user's customized template (user override takes precedence)
- **If not found**: Read `.arckit/templates/platform-design-template.md` (default)
> **Tip**: Users can customize templates with `$arckit-customize platform-design`
This template contains the structure for all 8 PDT canvases.
---
### Step 3: Auto-Populate from Existing Artifacts
**CRITICAL**: To create a high-quality, integrated platform design, extract data from existing ArcKit artifacts:
#### 3.1 Extract Stakeholder Data → Entity Portraits
If `projects/{project_id}/ARC-*-STKE-*.md` exists:
**Read the file** and extract:
- **Stakeholders** → Map to **Entities** in ecosystem
- Example: "CFO" stakeholder → "Enterprise Buyer" entity (demand side)
- Example: "Service Provider" stakeholder → "Independent Consultant" entity (supply side)
- **Drivers** → Map to **Performance Pressures**
- Example: Driver "Reduce procurement costs" → Pressure "Cost reduction imperatives"
- **Goals** → Map to **Entity Goals**
- Example: Goal "Reduce vendor search time by 50%" → Entity goal in portrait
- **RACI Matrix** → Map to **Ecosystem Roles**
- Example: "Responsible" roles → Supply-side entities
- Example: "Accountable" roles → Demand-side entities or regulators
**Extraction Logic**:
```text
For each stakeholder in ARC-*-STKE-*.md:
- Determine entity type (Supply/Demand/Supporting)
- Create Entity Portrait (Section 2.2, 2.3, 2.4)
- Populate context from stakeholder description
- Populate pressures from drivers
- Populate goals from stakeholder goals
- Populate gains from outcomes
```
#### 3.2 Extract Requirements → Platform Capabilities
If `projects/{project_id}/ARC-*-REQ-*.md` exists:
**Read the file** and extract:
- **BR (Business Requirements)** → Map to **Value Creation** and **Revenue Model**
- Example: "BR-001: Reduce vendor onboarding time by 80%" → Transaction T-002 cost reduction
- **FR (Functional Requirements)** → Map to **Platform Features** and **Transaction Engine**
- Example: "FR-010: Provider search and filtering" → Core journey step, T-001 transaction
- **NFR (Non-Functional Requirements)** → Map to **Platform Architecture** and **MVP Scope**
- Example: "NFR-S-002: Handle 10,000 transactions/month" → Transaction velocity target
- Example: "NFR-A-001: 99.9% availability SLA" → Platform Experience Canvas SLA
- **DR (Data Requirements)** → Map to **Learning Engine** (analytics, insights)
- Example: "DR-005: Performance analytics data" → Learning Service 1
**Extraction Logic**:
```text
For each requirement in ARC-*-REQ-*.md:
- Map BR-xxx to business model and value creation
- Map FR-xxx to platform features and transactions
- Map NFR-xxx to architecture and scale targets
- Map DR-xxx to learning engine data flows
```
#### 3.3 Extract Wardley Map → Build vs. Buy Strategy
If `projects/{project_id}/wardley-maps/ARC-*-WARD-*.md` exists:
**Read Wardley map(s)** and extract:
- **Components** and their **Evolution Stages**:
- Genesis (0.00-0.25) → **Build** (novel, differentiating)
- Custom (0.25-0.50) → **Build or Partner** (emerging, core capability)
- Product (0.50-0.75) → **Buy** (commercial products available)
- Commodity (0.75-1.00) → **Use Utility** (cloud, SaaS, APIs)
**Use evolution analysis** in Platform Design Canvas (Section 8.3):
- Identify which platform components to build (Custom/Genesis)
- Identify which to buy/use (Product/Commodity)
- Example: "Service matching algorithm" at Custom (0.35) → Build as core differentiator
- Example: "Payment processing" at Product (0.70) → Use Stripe API
#### 3.4 Extract Architecture Principles → Platform Governance
Read `projects/000-global/ARC-000-PRIN-*.md`:
**Extract principles** that apply to platform strategy:
- Example: Principle "API-First" → Platform must expose APIs for ecosystem integrations
- Example: Principle "Data Privacy by Design" → Learning engine must anonymize entity data
- Example: Principle "Cloud-Native" → Platform runs on AWS/Azure, serverless where possible
**Apply principles** in Platform Design Canvas (Section 8.4 Strategic Alignment)
---
### Step 3b: Read external documents and policies
- Read any **external documents** listed in the project context (`external/` files) — extract current platform architecture, ecosystem participants, API catalogues, platform metrics
- Read any **enterprise standards** in `projects/000-global/external/` — extract enterprise platform strategy, shared service catalogues, cross-project platform integration standards
- If no external platform docs found but they would improve the design, ask: "Do you have any existing platform documentation, ecosystem maps, or API catalogues? I can read PDFs and images directly. Place them in `projects/{project-dir}/external/` and re-run, or skip."
- **Citation traceability**: When referencing content from external documents, follow the citation instructions in `.arckit/references/citation-instructions.md`. Place inline citation markers (e.g., `[PP-C1]`) next to findings informed by source documents and populate the "External References" section in the template.
---
### Step 4: Detect Version
Before generating the document ID, check if a previous version exists:
1. Look for existing `ARC-{PROJECT_ID}-PLAT-v*.md` files in the project directory
2. **If no existing file**: Use VERSION="1.0"
3. **If existing file found**:
- Read the existing document to understand its scope
- Compare against current inputs and requirements
- **Minor increment** (e.g., 1.0 → 1.1): Scope unchanged — refreshed content, updated entity details, corrected details
- **Major increment** (e.g., 1.0 → 2.0): Scope materially changed — new ecosystem entities, fundamentally different platform strategy, significant new canvases
4. Use the determined version for document ID, filename, Document Control, and Revision History
5. For v1.1+/v2.0+: Add a Revision History entry describing what changed from the previous version
### Step 5: Construct Document Control Metadata
- **Document ID**: `ARC-{PROJECT_ID}-PLAT-v{VERSION}` (e.g., `ARC-001-PLAT-v1.0`)
**Populate document control fields**:
- `document_id`: Constructed from format above
- `project_id`: From Step 1
- `project_name`: From Step 1
- `version`: Determined version from Step 4
- `author`: "ArcKit Platform Design Command"
- `date_created`: Current date (YYYY-MM-DD)
- `date_updated`: Current date (YYYY-MM-DD)
- `generation_date`: Current date and time
- `ai_model`: Your model name (e.g., "Claude 3.5 Sonnet")
---
### Step 6: Generate Platform Design Using PDT Methodology
**CRITICAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR QUALITY**:
1. **This is a LARGE document** (8 canvases, 1,800+ lines). You MUST use the **Write tool** to create the file. DO NOT output the full document to the user (you will exceed token limits).
2. **Follow PDT v2.2.1 methodology** (Boundaryless.io):
- 8 canvases in sequence
- Focus on multi-sided ecosystem thinking
- Transaction cost reduction is core value proposition
- Learning engine creates long-term defensibility
3. **Complete ALL 8 canvases** with depth:
**Canvas 1: Ecosystem Canvas**
- Map 5-15 entity types (Supply side, Demand side, Supporting)
- Create Mermaid diagram showing relationships
- Catalog entities with roles, resources provided/consumed
- Define ecosystem boundaries and interfaces
**Canvas 2: Entity-Role Portraits** (3-5 portraits minimum)
- Portrait 1: Primary supply-side entity (e.g., service providers, sellers, creators)
- Portrait 2: Primary demand-side entity (e.g., buyers, consumers, learners)
- Portrait 3: Supporting entity (e.g., regulator, payment provider, insurer)
- For EACH portrait:
- Context: Who they are, current situation, constraints
- Performance Pressures: External and internal forces
- Goals: Short-term (0-6mo), medium-term (6-18mo), long-term (18+mo)
- Gains Sought: 5 value propositions with metrics
- Linkage to Platform Features: Map goals → features → value delivery
**Canvas 3: Motivations Matrix**
- Cross-entity motivation analysis (NxN matrix where N = number of entities)
- Identify synergies (aligned motivations)
- Identify conflicts (misaligned motivations)
- For each conflict: Platform solution to resolve it
**Canvas 4: Transactions Board** (10-20 transactions minimum)
- Catalog all transactions in ecosystem
- For EACH transaction:
- Transaction name
- From entity → To entity
- Existing? (Yes/No - does it happen today?)
- Current channel and transaction costs
- Platform channel and reduced costs
- Cost reduction percentage
- Analyze transaction costs: Search, Information, Negotiation, Coordination, Enforcement
- Calculate total value created (cost savings × transaction volume)
**Canvas 5: Learning Engine Canvas** (5+ learning services)
- Design services that help entities improve continuously
- For EACH learning service:
- What: Service description
- Inputs: Data sources
- Outputs: Delivered value
- How Entity Improves: Specific improvements
- Platform Benefit: Why this creates defensibility
- Success Metric: Measurable impact
- Define learning services business model (freemium, premium tiers)
**Canvas 6: Platform Experience Canvas** (2+ core journeys)
- Journey 1: Supply-side onboarding and first sale
- Journey 2: Demand-side discovery and first purchase
- For EACH journey:
- Journey map: 8-10 stages from awareness to retention
- For each stage: Entity action, platform service, transaction ID, learning service, touchpoint, pain point addressed
- Journey metrics: Time, cost, completion rate, satisfaction
- Business Model Canvas: Revenue streams, cost structure, unit economics, LTV:CAC ratios
**Canvas 7: Minimum Viable Platform Canvas**
- Critical assumptions (5+): What must be true for platform to succeed?
- For each assumption: Riskiness (High/Medium/Low), evidence needed, test method
- MVP feature set: What's IN, what's OUT (defer to post-validation)
- Liquidity bootstrapping strategy: How to solve chicken-and-egg problem
- Phase 1: Curate initial supply
- Phase 2: Seed demand
- Phase 3: Test transaction velocity
- Phase 4: Expand liquidity
- Validation metrics: 10+ success criteria for Go/No-Go decision after 90 days
- MVP timeline and budget
**Canvas 8: Platform Design Canvas (Synthesis)**
- The 6 Building Blocks:
1. Ecosystem: Who participates, ecosystem size targets
2. Value Creation: Value for supply, demand, overall ecosystem
3. Value Capture: Revenue model, pricing rationale
4. Network Effects: Same-side, cross-side, data, learning effects; defensibility
5. Transaction Engine: Core transactions, cost reductions, velocity targets
6. Learning Engine: Learning services summary, revenue, impact
- Strategic Alignment: Link to stakeholders, requirements, principles, Wardley maps
- UK Government Context: GaaP, TCoP, Service Standard, Digital Marketplace
5. **Auto-populate from artifacts** (from Step 3):
- Entity portraits from ARC-*-STKE-*.md
- Platform capabilities from ARC-*-REQ-*.md
- Build vs. buy from wardley-maps/ARC-*-WARD-*.md
- Governance from ARC-000-PRIN-*.md
6. **UK Government Context** (if applicable):
- Government as a Platform (GaaP) principles
- Technology Code of Practice (TCoP) alignment
- GDS Service Standard implications
- Digital Marketplace positioning (G-Cloud, DOS)
7. **Generate complete traceability** (Section 9):
- Stakeholder → Entity → Value Proposition
- Requirement → Platform Feature → Implementation
- Wardley Component → Build/Buy Decision
- Risk → Platform Mitigation
8. **Provide actionable next steps** (Section 10):
- Immediate actions (30 days): Validate assumptions, prototype MVP
- MVP build phase (Months 2-4): Product development, provider acquisition
- MVP validation phase (Months 5-7): Buyer onboarding, transaction velocity
- Go/No-Go decision (Month 7): Review validation metrics
- Scale phase (Months 8-24): Full feature set, growth, funding
---
### Step 7: Write the Document
Before writing the file, read `.arckit/references/quality-checklist.md` and verify all **Common Checks** plus the **PLAT** per-type checks pass. Fix any failures before proceeding.
**USE THE WRITE TOOL** to create the platform design document:
```text
File path: projects/{project_id}-{project_name}/ARC-{PROJECT_ID}-PLAT-v${VERSION}.md
Content: [Complete platform design following template, all 8 canvases filled out]
```
**IMPORTANT**:
- This document will be 1,500-2,500 lines
- DO NOT output the full document in chat (token limit)
- Use Write tool to create file
- Only show summary to user
---
### Step 8: Generate Summary for User
After writing the file, provide a **concise summary** (NOT the full document):
```markdown
✅ Platform Strategy Design Created
**Project**: {project_name} ({project_id})
**Document**: projects/{project_id}-{project_name}/ARC-{PROJECT_ID}-PLAT-v1.0.md
**Document ID**: {document_id}
## Platform Overview
**Platform Name**: {platform_name}
**Platform Vision**: {one-sentence vision}
**Ecosystem Size (3-year target)**:
- {X} supply-side entities
- {Y} demand-side entities
- £{Z}M Gross Merchandise Value (GMV) annually
## The 8 PDT Canvases (Summary)
### 1. Ecosystem Canvas
- **Entities Mapped**: {N} entity types
- **Supply Side**: {entity types}
- **Demand Side**: {entity types}
- **Supporting**: {entity types}
### 2. Entity Portraits
- **Portraits Created**: {N} (supply-side, demand-side, supporting)
- **Key Entity 1**: {name} - {primary value sought}
- **Key Entity 2**: {name} - {primary value sought}
### 3. Motivations Matrix
- **Key Synergies**: {N synergies identified}
- **Key Conflicts**: {N conflicts to resolve}
- **Example Synergy**: {brief description}
- **Example Conflict**: {brief description + platform solution}
### 4. Transactions Board
- **Transactions Cataloged**: {N} transactions
- **Transaction Cost Reduction**: {X}% average reduction
- **Annual Value Created**: £{Y}M in transaction cost savings
- **Key Transaction**: {T-ID}: {name} - {cost reduction}%
### 5. Learning Engine
- **Learning Services**: {N} services designed
- **Supply-Side Services**: {list}
- **Demand-Side Services**: {list}
- **Learning Revenue**: £{X}K/year projected
### 6. Platform Experience
- **Core Journeys Mapped**: {N} journeys
- **Journey 1**: {name} - {completion time} ({X}% faster than current)
- **Journey 2**: {name} - {completion time} ({X}% faster than current)
- **Business Model**: {revenue model summary}
- **Unit Economics**: Supply LTV:CAC = {X}:1, Demand LTV:CAC = {Y}:1
### 7. Minimum Viable Platform (MVP)
- **Critical Assumptions**: {N} assumptions to validate
- **MVP Scope**: {X} features IN, {Y} features deferred
- **Liquidity Strategy**: {brief description of chicken-and-egg solution}
- **Validation Target**: {X} transactions in 90 days
- **MVP Budget**: £{X}K
- **Go/No-Go Metrics**: {N} success criteria
### 8. Platform Design Canvas (Synthesis)
- **Value Creation**: £{X} per transaction cost savings
- **Value Capture**: {commission}% transaction fee + £{Y}/mo subscriptions
- **Network Effects**: {type} - {brief description}
- **Defensibility**: {key moat}
- **Year 1 Revenue**: £{X}K projected
## Auto-Population Sources
{IF ARC-*-STKE-*.md used:}
✅ **Stakeholders** → Entity portraits auto-populated from ARC-*-STKE-*.md
- {N} stakeholders mapped to {M} ecosystem entities
{IF ARC-*-REQ-*.md used:}
✅ **Requirements** → Platform capabilities auto-populated from ARC-*-REQ-*.md
- {N} BR requirements → Value creation
- {M} FR requirements → Platform features
- {K} NFR requirements → Architecture and scale
{IF wardley-maps used:}
✅ **Wardley Maps** → Build vs. buy strategy from {map_name}
- {N} components to BUILD (Custom/Genesis)
- {M} components to BUY (Product/Commodity)
{IF ARC-000-PRIN-*.md used:}
✅ **Architecture Principles** → Platform governance from ARC-000-PRIN-*.md
- {N} principles applied to platform design
## UK Government Context
{IF applicable:}
✅ **Government as a Platform (GaaP)** alignment documented
✅ **Technology Code of Practice (TCoP)** compliance approach
✅ **GDS Service Standard** implications analyzed
✅ **Digital Marketplace** positioning (G-Cloud/DOS)
## Traceability
✅ **Stakeholder-to-Platform**: {N} linkages created
✅ **Requirements-to-Platform**: {M} linkages created
✅ **Wardley-to-Strategy**: {K} linkages created
✅ **Risk-to-Mitigation**: {J} linkages created
## Next Steps (Immediate Actions)
1. **Validate Assumptions** (Next 30 days):
- Interview {X} potential supply-side entities
- Interview {Y} potential demand-side entities
- Test pricing sensitivity
2. **Prototype MVP** (Next 30 days):
- Design wireframes for core journeys
- Build tech stack proof-of-concept
- Test payment escrow
3. **Fundraising**:
- Pitch deck based on Platform Design Canvas
- Financial model (GMV, revenue, unit economics)
- Raise £{X}K seed funding for MVP
## Files Created
📄 `projects/{project_id}-{project_name}/ARC-{PROJECT_ID}-PLAT-v1.0.md` ({file_size} lines)
## Related Commands
**Prerequisites** (should run before platform design):
- `$arckit-principles` - Architecture principles
- `$arckit-stakeholders` - Stakeholder analysis (highly recommended)
- `$arckit-requirements` - Platform requirements (recommended)
- `$arckit-wardley` - Value chain analysis (recommended)
**Next Steps** (run after platform design):
- `$arckit-sow` - RFP for platform development vendors
- `$arckit-hld-review` - Review high-level platform architecture
- `$arckit-backlog` - Generate sprint backlog from platform features
## Methodology Reference
**Platform Design Toolkit (PDT) v2.2.1**
- Source: Boundaryless.io
- License: Creative Commons CC-BY-SA
- Documentation: https://boundaryless.io/pdt-toolkit/
- Guide: docs/guides/platform-design.md
---
💡 **Tip**: The platform design document is comprehensive (1,500-2,500 lines). Review each canvas section to understand:
- Who participates in your ecosystem
- What value you create and how you capture it
- How transactions and learning create defensibility
- What MVP to build and how to validate it
The Platform Design Canvas (Section 8) provides a single-page synthesis perfect for executive presentations and fundraising.
```
---
## Important Notes
1. **Template-Driven**: Use platform-design-template.md as structure, fill with project-specific content
2. **Auto-Population**: Extract data from existing artifacts to create integrated, traceability-rich design
3. **PDT Methodology**: Follow Boundaryless.io Platform Design Toolkit v2.2.1 rigorously
- 8 canvases in sequence
- Transaction cost economics
- Learning engine as moat
- Network effects analysis
- MVP validation strategy
4. **UK Government Context**: If project is UK gov/public sector, emphasize GaaP, TCoP, Digital Marketplace
5. **Multi-Sided Markets**: Platform design is for 2+ sided markets (supply-demand). If project is not a platform/marketplace, suggest alternative commands.
6. **Token Management**: Use Write tool for large document. Show summary only to user.
7. **Traceability**: Every platform decision should link back to stakeholders, requirements, principles, or Wardley maps
8. **MVP Focus**: Canvas 7 (MVP) is critical - help architect define smallest testable platform to validate riskiest assumptions
9. **Liquidity Bootstrapping**: Canvas 7 must address chicken-and-egg problem with specific strategy
10. **Network Effects**: Canvas 8 must articulate defensibility through network effects, data moats, learning loops
---
- **Markdown escaping**: When writing less-than or greater-than comparisons, always include a space after `<` or `>` (e.g., `< 3 seconds`, `> 99.9% uptime`) to prevent markdown renderers from interpreting them as HTML tags or emoji
## Example Use Cases
**Good Use Cases for Platform Design**:
- Multi-sided marketplaces (e.g., supplier-buyer platforms, G-Cloud)
- Data sharing platforms (e.g., cross-government data mesh, NHS data sharing)
- Service platforms (e.g., GOV.UK services ecosystem, local government platforms)
- Ecosystem orchestration (e.g., vendor ecosystem, partner network, app store)
**Not Suitable for Platform Design**:
- Single-product SaaS applications (use $arckit-requirements and $arckit-hld-review instead)
- Internal enterprise systems without multi-sided ecosystem (use $arckit-requirements)
- Point-to-point integrations (use $arckit-diagram for architecture)
If user's project doesn't fit platform pattern, recommend appropriate alternative command.