claim-decomposition
$
npx mdskill add yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine/claim-decompositionParses patent claims into their structural components — identifying independent vs. dependent claims, extracting individual elements, and mapping features to technical domains.
SKILL.md
.github/skills/claim-decompositionView on GitHub ↗
--- name: claim-decomposition description: Independent/dependent claim parsing, element extraction, and feature mapping to technical domains execution: tactic used-by: patent-mining --- # Claim Decomposition Parses patent claims into their structural components — identifying independent vs. dependent claims, extracting individual elements, and mapping features to technical domains. ## Stages ### 1. Independent Claim Identification - Identify all independent claims (method, apparatus, system, composition) - Determine claim category (process, machine, manufacture, composition of matter) - Extract the preamble, transitional phrase, and body of each independent claim ### 2. Dependent Claim Tree Construction - Map dependency relationships (which claims depend on which) - Build the full claim tree hierarchy - Identify claim sets (groups of dependents narrowing the same independent) ### 3. Element Extraction - Parse each claim into individual elements (limitations) - Identify structural elements vs. functional elements - Extract means-plus-function limitations and their corresponding structure ### 4. Feature Mapping to Technical Domains - Map extracted elements to technical feature categories - Identify which elements correspond to known technology components - Create feature-to-claim mapping for scope analysis ## Available SOPs | SOP | Role | |-----|------| | claim-parsing | Core parsing of claim text into structured elements | | patent-categorization | Classify claim elements by technical domain | | quality-scoring | Assess claim quality based on structure and specificity | ## Execution Guidance - Always start with independent claims — they define the broadest protection - Transitional phrases matter: "comprising" (open) vs. "consisting of" (closed) - Means-plus-function claims (35 USC 112(f)) have narrower scope than they appear - Method claims and apparatus claims may cover the same invention differently - Count elements carefully — more elements = narrower claim scope ## Yield Report Report to calling strategy after each execution: - Number of claims parsed (independent + dependent) - Total elements extracted - Claim tree depth (max dependency chain) - Feature categories identified